2018
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty1667
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moonfalls: collisions between the Earth and its past moons

Abstract: During the last stages of the terrestrial planet formation, planets grow mainly through giant-impacts with large planetary embryos. The Earth's Moon was suggested to form through one of these impacts. However, since the proto-Earth has experienced many giant-impacts, several moons (and also the final Moon) are naturally expected to form through/as-part-of a sequence of multiple (including smaller scale) impacts. Each impact potentially forms a sub-Lunar mass moonlet that interacts gravitationally with the prot… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sequences of impacts that result in 1−4 moonlet mergers are possible, particularly if the outer moonlet is larger than the inner moonlet and at an intermediate distance from the proto-Earth, and the likelihood of moonlet mergers could increase if subsequent moonlets are preferentially generated near the Laplace plane of pre-existing moonlets. Our simulations suggest that moonlets are also likely to infall and impact the proto-Earth, which could have consequences for early Earth evolution (Malamud et al 2018). In the context of a single-impact origin of the Moon, we find that several giant impacts may have post-dated Moon formation, because a large outer moon is stable against subsequent impacts and moonlet formation events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Sequences of impacts that result in 1−4 moonlet mergers are possible, particularly if the outer moonlet is larger than the inner moonlet and at an intermediate distance from the proto-Earth, and the likelihood of moonlet mergers could increase if subsequent moonlets are preferentially generated near the Laplace plane of pre-existing moonlets. Our simulations suggest that moonlets are also likely to infall and impact the proto-Earth, which could have consequences for early Earth evolution (Malamud et al 2018). In the context of a single-impact origin of the Moon, we find that several giant impacts may have post-dated Moon formation, because a large outer moon is stable against subsequent impacts and moonlet formation events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The parameters for the EOS are taken from Melosh (1989) and Benz & Asphaug (1999), for iron and silicate (basalt) respectively. See Malamud et al (2018) for further details.…”
Section: Code Outline and Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Figure 4 we plot the cumulative distribution function of all our hybrid simulations to gain some statistical insights. We only calculate the orbital period for fragments with two or more SPH particles, using the method in Malamud et al (2018), while single SPH particles do not provide any rotational information and are therefore ignored. Note that at the beginning of disc formation, we have small number statistics for the q = 1R ⊙ simulations (the disruptions being partial), while for the q = 0.1R ⊙ simulations, virtually all fragments are close to the single SPH particle size, even after the first planet disruption, hence we have a similar problem.…”
Section: Self-rotation Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%