2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102833
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mood disorders disrupt the functional dynamics, not spatial organization of brain resting state networks

Abstract: Highlights Mood disorder (bipolar and unipolar) patients have aberrant functional connectivity. We recovered functional networks at rest from mood disorder patients and controls. Our method identifies transient brain activity changes and dynamic interactions. Patients showed increased default-mode network (DMN) duration, but normal structure. Depression modulated the duration of DMN, intrusive thoughts that of posterio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
34
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 133 publications
7
34
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The 13 extracted spatial maps represented in each iCAP correspond to well-known resting state networks and were reminiscent of common task-related and cognitive networks typically observed in fMRI studies (Van Den Heuvel and Pol, 2010). They also correspond to iCAP networks identified in previous studies (Bommarito et al, 2021; Piguet et al, 2021; Siffredi et al, 2021; Zöller et al, 2019). Specifically, the obtained networks included sensory-related networks, i.e., sensori-motor/auditory, primary and secondary visual; higher level cognitive network, i.e., the fronto-parietal, frontal and fronto-temporal left and right networks; and default-mode network (DMN) decomposed into precuneus/posterior DMN and posterior DMN.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The 13 extracted spatial maps represented in each iCAP correspond to well-known resting state networks and were reminiscent of common task-related and cognitive networks typically observed in fMRI studies (Van Den Heuvel and Pol, 2010). They also correspond to iCAP networks identified in previous studies (Bommarito et al, 2021; Piguet et al, 2021; Siffredi et al, 2021; Zöller et al, 2019). Specifically, the obtained networks included sensory-related networks, i.e., sensori-motor/auditory, primary and secondary visual; higher level cognitive network, i.e., the fronto-parietal, frontal and fronto-temporal left and right networks; and default-mode network (DMN) decomposed into precuneus/posterior DMN and posterior DMN.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The 13 extracted spatial maps represented in each iCAP correspond to well-known resting state networks and were reminiscent of common task-related and cognitive networks typically observed in fMRI studies (Van Den Heuvel and Pol, 2010). They also correspond to iCAP networks identified in previous studies (Bommarito et al, 2021;Piguet et al, 2021;Siffredi et al, 2021;Zöller et al, 2019).…”
Section: Participant Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations