2018
DOI: 10.21659/rupkatha.v10n2.02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mood Baroco, Avicenna’s proof of it, and reasoning by means of models

Abstract: In several works, the mental models theory has been used in order to check whether or not some ancient logics are more related to the actual human reasoning than standard or classical logic. In this paper, I try to make further analyses in this direction. In particular, I address mood Baroco in Aristotelian logic and the proof of it by Avicenna. My conclusions refer to that, apart from the fact that it is true that the mental models theory can indicate the possible cognitive scope that can be attributed to Ari… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the one hand, this approach correlates well with the pluralist approach to rationality within philosophy, with the context dependencies that logic studies. Moreover, it is also consistent with cognitive-psychological concepts such as the theory of mental models (Stenning 2001, Stenning and van Lambalgen 2007, López-Astorga 2018 -people think in terms of models created by their knowledge and ideas about the world. On the other hand, this reasoning contains technical complications: first, it is pretty challenging to evaluate rationality in each specific case because there will always be an infinite number of issues; secondly, one interlocutor's understanding of the situation, that is, his model, does not necessarily coincide with another's understanding of the situation, which makes the principle of comparison and evaluation unclear.…”
Section: Psychological Experiments and Logicsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…On the one hand, this approach correlates well with the pluralist approach to rationality within philosophy, with the context dependencies that logic studies. Moreover, it is also consistent with cognitive-psychological concepts such as the theory of mental models (Stenning 2001, Stenning and van Lambalgen 2007, López-Astorga 2018 -people think in terms of models created by their knowledge and ideas about the world. On the other hand, this reasoning contains technical complications: first, it is pretty challenging to evaluate rationality in each specific case because there will always be an infinite number of issues; secondly, one interlocutor's understanding of the situation, that is, his model, does not necessarily coincide with another's understanding of the situation, which makes the principle of comparison and evaluation unclear.…”
Section: Psychological Experiments and Logicsupporting
confidence: 75%