2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2009.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mood-as-input and depressive rumination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
23
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
23
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The current finding adds further support for the well-established association between depression and rumination (Ehring & Watkins, 2008;Nolen-Hoeksema et al, 2008) in that people with higher depression symptom levels are more likely to employ brooding thinking following a negative event than individuals with lower levels of depression. On the other hand, and inconsistent with Hawksley and Davey (2010), temporary low mood was not related to ongoing rumination in the current sample. There are four possible explanations for this: (1) the smaller effect (d = 0.86 between the SAF and control groups) of mood induction than that achieved by Hawksley and Davey (2010) (d = 1.31); (2) because the effect of sad mood is only relevant when the contents of memory are personal depressive events rather fictional trauma stimuli;…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The current finding adds further support for the well-established association between depression and rumination (Ehring & Watkins, 2008;Nolen-Hoeksema et al, 2008) in that people with higher depression symptom levels are more likely to employ brooding thinking following a negative event than individuals with lower levels of depression. On the other hand, and inconsistent with Hawksley and Davey (2010), temporary low mood was not related to ongoing rumination in the current sample. There are four possible explanations for this: (1) the smaller effect (d = 0.86 between the SAF and control groups) of mood induction than that achieved by Hawksley and Davey (2010) (d = 1.31); (2) because the effect of sad mood is only relevant when the contents of memory are personal depressive events rather fictional trauma stimuli;…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…On the other hand, and inconsistent with Hawksley and Davey (2010), temporary low mood was not related to ongoing rumination in the current sample. There are four possible explanations for this: (1) the smaller effect (d = 0.86 between the SAF and control groups) of mood induction than that achieved by Hawksley and Davey (2010) (d = 1.31); (2) because the effect of sad mood is only relevant when the contents of memory are personal depressive events rather fictional trauma stimuli;…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, while the scope of this manuscript prevented a full review of mood, extended cognition and psychopathology, a number of studies have demonstrated that changes in mood can result in sustained rumination (e.g. Hawksley & Davey, 2010;Watkins & Mason, 2002). A pressing question for future research is why some individuals respond in different ways to negative mood states.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result suggests that the relation between mood and the way of processing information (the general amount of processing, i.e., decision time and the amount of information processed, as well as selectivity of processing) may not be fixed and differ depending on the interaction of mood and the context of the task. This view seems to be correct in the light of recent research indicating the context-dependence of mood in perseverative worry and rumination (Hawksley & Davey, 2010), negotiating stance in bargaining (Carnevale, 2008), and creativity (Davis, 2009). It is also relevant to predecisional information processing which is similarly influenced by criteria for stopping information search (Browne & Pitts, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%