2012
DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/49/4/577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monte Carlo uncertainty estimation for an oscillating-vessel viscosity measurement

Abstract: This paper discusses the initial design and evaluation of a high temperature viscosity measurement system with the focus on the uncertainty assessment. Numerical simulation of the viscometer is used to estimate viscosity uncertainties through the Monte Carlo method. The simulation computes the system response for a particular set of inputs (viscosity, moment of inertia, spring constant and hysteretic damping), and the viscosity is calculated using two methods: the Roscoe approximate solution and a numerical-fi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also easily observed is the regression failure present in the results when the moment of inertia (I) is too far off the actual value. This is caused by the change in oscillation period cause by variation in I which cannot be accounted for by other variables, especially the viscosity and body force constant, and has been observed in previous analysis [17]. This problem can be remedied by allowing I to vary during the fitting process and then verifying that the fitted moment of inertia matches the measured value afterwards.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also easily observed is the regression failure present in the results when the moment of inertia (I) is too far off the actual value. This is caused by the change in oscillation period cause by variation in I which cannot be accounted for by other variables, especially the viscosity and body force constant, and has been observed in previous analysis [17]. This problem can be remedied by allowing I to vary during the fitting process and then verifying that the fitted moment of inertia matches the measured value afterwards.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Since previous studies of the uncertainty in oscillating cup viscometer measurements noted a linear relationship between the uncertainty of input parameters and the resultant uncertainty of the viscosity, a full Monte Carlo simulation was deemed unnecessary for the present work [17]. Since the experimental data from the only RMF viscometer experiment is available for use, the parameters of that physical experiment were used as the baseline values for the simulations, and deviations from this baseline were simulated.…”
Section: Sensitivity Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first method finds primary use due to its simplicity, both theoretical and practical. The second method, that of Monte Carlo uncertainty propagation, has found favor more recently as personal computers have become sufficiently powerful to handle the computational costs associated with it [17,18,19]. As the name implies, this method is a stochastic estimation of the uncertainty through repeated application of the data reduction process.…”
Section: Monte Carlo Uncertainty Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two groups are defined for each layer in the sample, and are so generally well understood as to require no additional comment here. Equation (18) defines π 1 which is the ratio of effusivities and has no commonly used name, but appears as b i, j in the one-dimensional model. This value was found by Almond and Patel to quantify the thermal mismatch between the two materials, and determines the magnitudes of the reflection and transmission of thermal waves [2].…”
Section: Non-dimensionalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation