2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2015.06.083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monte Carlo tools evaluation for nuclear analyses of the European DEMO

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A huge effort of code and nuclear data verification was carried out to ensure energy balance coherence (comparison with NJOY HEATR module). In recent benchmark comparisons, between MCNP5 & TRIPOLI-4 ® , a good agreement is noticed for NH calculation: DEMO generic model [15] and ITER A-lite [10].…”
Section: Nuclear Heatingmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A huge effort of code and nuclear data verification was carried out to ensure energy balance coherence (comparison with NJOY HEATR module). In recent benchmark comparisons, between MCNP5 & TRIPOLI-4 ® , a good agreement is noticed for NH calculation: DEMO generic model [15] and ITER A-lite [10].…”
Section: Nuclear Heatingmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The DEMO generic model in TRIPOLI-4 ® format was generated by McCad [15]. The breeding blanket modules (BBM) segmentation, Breeder Unit geometry and compositions were defined using the MCNP5 model, kindly provided by ENEA.…”
Section: Tripoli-4 ® Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%