2007
DOI: 10.1016/s1507-1367(10)60064-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monte Carlo study on the impact of spinal fixation rods on dose distribution in photon beams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second culprit of dosimetric uncertainty in calculating with metallic objects is inherent in the limitation of the calculation algorithm in the treatment planning system. While it has been widely established that Monte Carlo algorithms can best estimate the dose distributions with the presence of metallic implants [9] [11] [23] [24], dose calculation with high density materials is not accurate with the AAA algorithm. As demonstrated from the open beam measurements in Figure 2, AAA underestimated the lateral scatter and attenuation of titanium and cobalt-chrome, and the inaccuracy increased with material density.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second culprit of dosimetric uncertainty in calculating with metallic objects is inherent in the limitation of the calculation algorithm in the treatment planning system. While it has been widely established that Monte Carlo algorithms can best estimate the dose distributions with the presence of metallic implants [9] [11] [23] [24], dose calculation with high density materials is not accurate with the AAA algorithm. As demonstrated from the open beam measurements in Figure 2, AAA underestimated the lateral scatter and attenuation of titanium and cobalt-chrome, and the inaccuracy increased with material density.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, metal implants distort dose distributions from therapeutic megavoltage beams. A 5% to 10% dose reduction to tissues in regions behind stabilization rods has been reported, due to the attenuation effect . As a result, some patients who might benefit from radiotherapy may be treated with lower doses unlikely to provide long‐term local control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…bone removal, tumour debulking etc.). [98,99] Further, as the spinal cord undergoes decompression, the location of the spinal cord is expected to shift over time and, therefore, the geometric constraints of the cord applied preoperatively are no longer valid. While care can be taken to maintain separation between the cord and the epidural disease by packing the surgical cavity, geometric limitations remain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%