“…Physical and dosimetric differences between standard FF and unflattened FFF beams have been analyzed by various groups both through measurements and/or using Monte Carlo simulations on modified or clinically available linacs. The main issues are summarized in the paper from Georg et al 4 They rely mainly on general beam characteristics, [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] spectrum, beam energy and depth doses, [15][16][17][18] backscatter, 19 electron contamination, 20 out of field dose, 10,11,20,21 neutron production, 20,22,23 and shielding requirements. 24,25 Standardized and consolidated beam parameters as described or referenced in, for example, AAPM TG 142, 26 are used today for the quality assurance of flat photon beams, e.g., flatness, symmetry, and penumbrae.…”
Ideas for quality controls used in establishing a quality assurance program when introducing FFF beams into the clinical environment are given here, keeping them similar to those used for standard FF beams. By following the suggestions in this report, the authors foresee that the introduction of FFF beams into a clinical radiotherapy environment will be as safe and well controlled as standard beam modalities using the existing guidelines.
“…Physical and dosimetric differences between standard FF and unflattened FFF beams have been analyzed by various groups both through measurements and/or using Monte Carlo simulations on modified or clinically available linacs. The main issues are summarized in the paper from Georg et al 4 They rely mainly on general beam characteristics, [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] spectrum, beam energy and depth doses, [15][16][17][18] backscatter, 19 electron contamination, 20 out of field dose, 10,11,20,21 neutron production, 20,22,23 and shielding requirements. 24,25 Standardized and consolidated beam parameters as described or referenced in, for example, AAPM TG 142, 26 are used today for the quality assurance of flat photon beams, e.g., flatness, symmetry, and penumbrae.…”
Ideas for quality controls used in establishing a quality assurance program when introducing FFF beams into the clinical environment are given here, keeping them similar to those used for standard FF beams. By following the suggestions in this report, the authors foresee that the introduction of FFF beams into a clinical radiotherapy environment will be as safe and well controlled as standard beam modalities using the existing guidelines.
“…A large number of studies have relied on Monte Carlo methods for the investigation of FFF beam characteristics; [13][14][15][16][17] with regard to direct measurements and commissioning, the majority of works have described the properties of linear accelerators of the Varian and Elekta types. [18][19][20][21][22][23] Only very few centers worldwide have so far, to our knowledge, worked with FFF Siemens accelerators, and information on the dosimetric properties is not yet available.…”
“…34,35 Removal of flattening filters from linacs has been proposed and studied in several investigations as a way to increase the dose rate for radiosurgery and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatments. 25,[36][37][38][39][40] It was shown that neutron fluence for a 18 MeV beam of Varian linac was about 69% lower for a flattening filter free beam measured by gold foil activation in neutron moderators. 39 Another MC study by Mesbahi on Elekta SL-25 showed results very close to those of a Varian linac.…”
Section: Photoneutron Production In Linac Headmentioning
In radiation therapy with high-energy photon beams (E > 10 MeV) neutrons are generated mainly in linacs head thorough (γ,n) interactions of photons with nuclei of high atomic number materials that constitute the linac head and the beam collimation system. These neutrons affect the shielding requirements in radiation therapy rooms and also increase the out-of-field radiation dose of patients undergoing radiation therapy with high-energy photon beams. In the current review, the authors describe the factors influencing the neutron production for different medical linacs based on the performed measurements and Monte Carlo studies in the literature.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.