2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-2614(00)01178-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monte Carlo simulations of zero electric field gradient liquid crystal mixtures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We described the solute as a spherocylinder having the same dimensions (radius 2.5 Å and length 5.0 Å) while we referred to ref. 38 to describe the rod fluid, using spherocylinders of radius r = 2.5 Å and length l = 10.0 Å and a number density ρ = 0.0024 Å −3 . Differences of G cav have been calculated for the solute oriented along the nematic director (Δ G ‖ ) and the solute perpendicular to the director (Δ G ⟂ ), determined both in a perfectly aligned nematic solvent (order parameter S = 1.0) and in a partially ordered fluid, having S = 0.7.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We described the solute as a spherocylinder having the same dimensions (radius 2.5 Å and length 5.0 Å) while we referred to ref. 38 to describe the rod fluid, using spherocylinders of radius r = 2.5 Å and length l = 10.0 Å and a number density ρ = 0.0024 Å −3 . Differences of G cav have been calculated for the solute oriented along the nematic director (Δ G ‖ ) and the solute perpendicular to the director (Δ G ⟂ ), determined both in a perfectly aligned nematic solvent (order parameter S = 1.0) and in a partially ordered fluid, having S = 0.7.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, our analysis shows that the practice of treating electrostatic interactions within uniaxial continuum descriptions of the solvent with empirically derived approximations for the solvent-solute potential is too simplistic. Moreover, even if the concept of an ''average electric field gradient'' 10,14 characteristic of each nematic solvent and its putative influence on solute quadrupole moments is viewed in its most primitive role-as a coarse descriptor of the nematic mean fieldthose critical experimental probes of evidence for such an average field gradient 31 and the results from theory 11 and from computer simulations 30 indicate that the concept is flawed. phenylacetylene ͑4a͒ and 4-n-pentyloxyphenylacetylene ͑4b͒ were obtained in excellent yields by coupling of the appropriate aryl halide ͑2a or 2b͒ with ͑trimethylsilyl͒acetylene in the presence of a palladium catalyst.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This picture was soon demonstrated to be inadequate 17,18 and it is now well established by several theoretical works and numerous computer simulations [19][20][21][22][23] that residual dipolar interactions are not only present in apolar mesophases, nematic, smectic or columnar, but that they can also have substantial effects on the thermodynamic stability of these phases, 24 produce molecular dimerisation via dipolar association, 25,26 give rise to phase re-entrance phenomena, 27 cause structural modifications in smectics, 28,29 etc. On the other hand, it was demonstrated theoretically, 11 and later found in simulations, 30 that the ad hoc ''EFG of the solvent'' is not strictly a solvent property but depends on the structure of the solute molecules as well. Moreover, the notion of a solvent-characteristic EFG is proven inadequate to account for direct NMR measurements of average EFGs experienced by the quadrupolar nuclei of the noble gas isotopes 21 Ne, 83 Kr, and 131 Xe in nematic solvents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28,29 In addition, others have emphasized that the efg experienced by a solute should be a property of both the solute and the liquid-crystal solvent. 10,15,22 In the following paper 47 we report results from Monte Carlo simulations of the experimental results reported in this paper.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The poorer quality of fits obtained for the component liquid-crystal solvents, as well as the change in the magnitude ͑not sign͒ of efg values compared to those obtained from D 2 experiments, is consistent with other studies which conclude that the average efg experienced by a solute is a function of both the solute and the solvent and therefore is not a property of the liquid-crystal solvent alone. 10,15,22,28,29 We emphasize the important point: the orientational order of solutes in MMs can be predicted to about 10% using models for short-range interactions that depend on the solute size and shape-other longer-range electrostatic interactions appear to be unimportant in these MMs. In other liquidcrystal solvents, additional electrostatic interactions ͑such as that between the mean electric field squared and the molecular polarizability anisotropy or the efg-Q mol interaction͒ play a role.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%