Monte Carlo simulation of the system performance of a long axial field-of-view PET based on monolithic LYSO detectors

Abstract

Background In light of the milestones achieved in PET design so far, further sensitivity improvements aim to optimise factors such as the dose, throughput, and detection of small lesions. While several longer axial field-of-view (aFOV) PET systems based on pixelated detectors have been installed, continuous monolithic scintillation detectors recently gained increased attention due to their depth of interaction capability and superior intrinsic resolution. As a result, the aim of this work is to present and evaluate the performance of two long aFOV, monolithic LYSO-based PET scanner designs. Methods Geant4 Application for Tomographic Emission (GATE) v9.1 was used to perform the simulations. Scanner designs A and B have an aFOV of 36.2 cm (7 rings) and 72.6 cm (14 rings), respectively, with 40 detector modules per ring each and a bore diameter of 70 cm. Each module is a 50 × 50 × 16 mm3 monolithic LYSO crystal. Sensitivity, noise equivalent count rate (NECR), scatter fraction, spatial resolution, and image quality tests were performed based on NEMA NU-2018 standards. Results The sensitivity of design A was calculated to be 29.2 kcps/MBq at the centre and 27 kcps/MBq at 10 cm radial offset; similarly, the sensitivity of design B was found to be 106.8 kcps/MBq and 98.3 kcps/MBq at 10 cm radial offset. NECR peaks were reached at activity concentrations beyond the range of activities used for clinical studies. In terms of spatial resolution, the values for the point sources were below 2 mm for the radial, tangential, and axial full width half maximum. The contrast recovery coefficient ranged from 53% for design B and 4:1 contrast ratio to 90% for design A and 8:1 ratio, with a reasonably low background variability. Conclusions Longer aFOV PET designs using monolithic LYSO have superior spatial resolution compared to current pixelated total-body PET (TB-PET) scanners. These systems combine high sensitivity with improved contrast recovery.

The detection instrumentation and geometric design of clinical PET scanner: towards better performance and broader clinical applications

“…These monolithic scintillation detectors have proved to be a promising alternative solution, as they can simultaneously meet all the requirements the detection system needs and be compatible with MRI when based on SiPM [156]. However, despite the simplicity implied by the use of this design, the complexity lies mainly in the algorithms and calibrations [69], since the calibration procedure required for event positioning and time estimation is time-consuming due to the distribution of scintillation light over several SiPMs [157], and sophisticated algorithms are required for accurate estimation of the gamma-ray interaction position inside the crystal [158]. Currently, efforts and approaches to optimise monolithic scintillators in PET detectors are being deployed and implemented [130].…”