2004
DOI: 10.1007/s11051-004-2161-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monte Carlo simulation of aggregate morphology for simultaneous coagulation and sintering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
51
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the ratio increased, the fractal dimension started to increase from 1.8 up to 2.6. This trend was similar to previous reports (Artelt et al 2003;Schmid et al 2004). Owing to the melting point of titania and the limitation of the initial particle size on the BD simulation, the fractal dimension of fully sintered agglomerates could not be obtained, unlike in the MC simulation (Schmid et al 2004).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As the ratio increased, the fractal dimension started to increase from 1.8 up to 2.6. This trend was similar to previous reports (Artelt et al 2003;Schmid et al 2004). Owing to the melting point of titania and the limitation of the initial particle size on the BD simulation, the fractal dimension of fully sintered agglomerates could not be obtained, unlike in the MC simulation (Schmid et al 2004).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Pairwise sintering of primary particles is assumed, even though it is not a natural occurrence (Kulkarni and Biswas 2003). In previous simulations, the structure of agglomerates during sintering was well presented with the MC simulations (Schmid et al 2004(Schmid et al , 2006Al Zaitone et al 2009). Nevertheless, pairwise sintering was used here because it reduced the computation time, and we believe it did not have much effect on the overall fractal dimension of the agglomerate.…”
Section: Simulation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Xing et al, 1997) and D f,max = 3, respectively, and has been recently approved by structure simulations (Schmid et al, 2004). D f,0 =D f ( =1) accounts for the fractal dimension at identical characteristic collision and fusion time and is assumed to be equal to the average value between the two limiting cases.…”
Section: Agglomerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, in the stochastic models, the microstructure evolution during sintering is considered to be driven by the minimization of one or several predefined energy functionals, and is simulated using Monte Carlo methods (or coupled with finite element method) [32] [37]. Bjørk et al explored the effect of particle size distributions on microstructural evolution during sintering using a similar Monte Carlo simulation [38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%