2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0146-6410(01)00157-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monte Carlo shell model for atomic nuclei

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
253
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 323 publications
(255 citation statements)
references
References 120 publications
2
253
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Table 2, even with 7%÷ 8% of the basis states, the J values coincide with the exact ones up to the second or third decimal digit. Thus, although the subspaces selected according to the sampling criterion (9) are not strictly J-invariant, the invariance is eventually restored by a relatively small fraction of basis states. Apparently, the components left out by the sampling are small and of little relevance to all observables.…”
Section: Numerical Implementation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown in Table 2, even with 7%÷ 8% of the basis states, the J values coincide with the exact ones up to the second or third decimal digit. Thus, although the subspaces selected according to the sampling criterion (9) are not strictly J-invariant, the invariance is eventually restored by a relatively small fraction of basis states. Apparently, the components left out by the sampling are small and of little relevance to all observables.…”
Section: Numerical Implementation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MC technique is used in the quantum Monte Carlo diagonalization (QMCD) method [8,9] just to generate stochastically a truncated basis. This is then used to diagonalize the Hamiltonian.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The delineation of levels up to several MeV in excitation energy in these nuclei is an important step towards providing a firmer understanding of their properties through comparisons with modern theoretical models. Much of this effort has been concentrated thus far on 68 Ni itself, with substantial improvements made to the level scheme [30][31][32] and deduced decay rates [12,31], as well as with comparisons of the data with Monte-Carlo shellmodel (MCSM) calculations [33,34]. The latter have provided strong evidence for coexisting spherical, oblate, and prolate shapes in this nucleus [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, it became possible to assess transition probabilities between states of different shapes, and to search for retarded decays which would be the signature of a shape-isomerlike structure. Monte Carlo shell model (MCSM) studies [23][24][25][26] have been performed for the neutron-rich 68-78 Ni isotopes and coexistence of low-lying spherical, oblate, and strongly deformed prolate shapes has been found in 68 Ni and 70 Ni [17,18]. A significant hindrance for the E2 transition deexciting the prolate deformed 0 þ state was predicted in 68 Ni only.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We performed new theoretical and experimental studies of 66 Ni low-lying states, with a particular focus on 0 þ states. The theoretical investigation was carried out within the Monte Carlo shell model [23][24][25][26], using the same Hamiltonian and model space as the ones previously employed for [68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78] Ni [17]. Figure 1 shows the potential energy surface of 66 Ni, obtained similarly to Refs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%