1995
DOI: 10.1002/aic.690410210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monte Carlo network simulation of horizontal, upflow and downflow depth filtration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(44 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The initial filter coefficient, , decreases 0 as increases, in accord with the corresponding predictions s Ž of previous work see, for instance, Tien and Payatakes, 1979;. Tien, 1989;Burganos et al, 1992aBurganos et al, , 1995 . Region 1 shrinks, region 2 shifts left, that is, to lower r⑀ values, while main-0 taining its breadth, and region 3 expands to the left.…”
Section: Insupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The initial filter coefficient, , decreases 0 as increases, in accord with the corresponding predictions s Ž of previous work see, for instance, Tien and Payatakes, 1979;. Tien, 1989;Burganos et al, 1992aBurganos et al, , 1995 . Region 1 shrinks, region 2 shifts left, that is, to lower r⑀ values, while main-0 taining its breadth, and region 3 expands to the left.…”
Section: Insupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Simulations of the depth filtration of non-Brownian particles (size larger than 2 lm) by Burganos et al [9][10][11] have shown that the fraction of convected-out particles is highly dependent on the detailed pore geometry and the superficial fluid velocity. In particular, the fraction of convected-out particles increases as the superficial velocity and/or the size of the constriction between neighboring grains increase.…”
Section: Critical Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is useful to stress that most of the reports requires that the center of a particle reaches the wall to be trapped. For our case, a criterion for trapping of the particles consider that the particle velocity at the inlet of the unit cell, u p , is equal to the local velocity of the fluid, [7] however, as was established in a user accessible subroutine, which indicated that a particle became attached to the wall when the pointed out by Burganos et al, [22] a more realistic value is obtained by considering that the particle velocity, at the inlet distance from its center to the wall was less than or equal to its radius, R. of the unit cell, is equal to the sum of the local fluid velocity, …”
Section: Assumptions Governing Equations and Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%