2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2012.04.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monte Carlo modelling for the in vivo lung monitoring of enriched uranium: Results of an international comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For this purpose, acquiring experimental data following the method employed here would be very difficult and tedious. Calculating the detector response with Monte Carlo methods was found to be reliable for welldefined experimental situations (Lamart et al, 2009;Lopez et al, 2011;Broggio et al, 2012). However, in the present case a very detailed model of the MUs would be necessary because of the significance of scattered radiation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…For this purpose, acquiring experimental data following the method employed here would be very difficult and tedious. Calculating the detector response with Monte Carlo methods was found to be reliable for welldefined experimental situations (Lamart et al, 2009;Lopez et al, 2011;Broggio et al, 2012). However, in the present case a very detailed model of the MUs would be necessary because of the significance of scattered radiation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This range is within a generally accepted uncertainty range for such kind of measurement. Only one result in task 2B (for participant P02), reported a large (Broggio et al, 2012). It indicates that building the mathematical model of the real detector, for the purpose of performing MC phantom calibrations, is not a large source of uncertainty.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The dissemination of knowledge and training in internal dosimetry is one of the main goals of Working Group 7. In collaboration with Working Group 6 (Computational Dosimetry), several intercomparison exercises on the application of Monte Carlo methods for the efficiency calibration of in-vivo counters have been undertaken (Gómez-Ros et al., 2008; Lopez et al., 2011b; Broggio et al., 2012; Vrba et al., 2014). In 2017, an intercomparison exercise with case studies for dose assessments has been organized.…”
Section: Selected Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%