2002
DOI: 10.1029/2000rg000089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monte Carlo Methods in Geophysical Inverse Problems

Abstract: [1] Monte Carlo inversion techniques were first used by Earth scientists more than 30 years ago. Since that time they have been applied to a wide range of problems, from the inversion of free oscillation data for whole Earth seismic structure to studies at the meter-scale lengths encountered in exploration seismology. This paper traces the development and application of Monte Carlo methods for inverse problems in the Earth sciences and in particular geophysics. The major developments in theory and application … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
395
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 649 publications
(408 citation statements)
references
References 203 publications
(300 reference statements)
1
395
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the deterministic model can be very complex and does not need to be linear, which is the main reason why this approach has been used extensively in a wide manifold of applications (for example, Naff et al, 1998;Sambridge and Mosegard, 2002). The limit of the Monte Carlo approach is that it may be extremely time consuming when complex deterministic (numerical) models need to be computed many times (for example, systems that are three-dimensional, or with nonlinear transients).…”
Section: Stochastic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the deterministic model can be very complex and does not need to be linear, which is the main reason why this approach has been used extensively in a wide manifold of applications (for example, Naff et al, 1998;Sambridge and Mosegard, 2002). The limit of the Monte Carlo approach is that it may be extremely time consuming when complex deterministic (numerical) models need to be computed many times (for example, systems that are three-dimensional, or with nonlinear transients).…”
Section: Stochastic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sivia (1996) is another useful reference, and a paper by Griffiths (1982) provides some geomorphological context. A wide range of computational techniques have been developed to enable Bayesian calculations in various settings, for which a review by Sambridge and Mosegaard (2002) may be a good starting point.…”
Section: Bayesian Inferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…He stated that there is a need to establish a scientific methodology for identifying and quantifying the possible impacts of uncertainty. For complex General Circulation Models (GCMs) he concluded that the Monte Carlo approach is the only practical solution to obtain uncertainty estimates despite the lack of rigor in the determination of the sample size and the enormous computational effort that is required, see also Sambridge and Mosegard (2002). If one is interested in the climate mean response to a small change in forcing, an alternative approach, based on the Fluctuation-Dissipation Theorem (Leith 1975), has been developed, see also Ch.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%