2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2007.02.102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monte Carlo method via a numerical algorithm to solve a parabolic problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From the numerical examples it can be seen that the proposed Monte Carlo method is efficient and accurate to estimate the solution of Fredholm integral eqs. (1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From the numerical examples it can be seen that the proposed Monte Carlo method is efficient and accurate to estimate the solution of Fredholm integral eqs. (1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Monte Carlo method is preferable for solving both high-dimensional multiple integrals and large sparse systems of linear algebraic equations [1][2][3]. Recently, Farnoosh and Ebrahimi [4] employed Monte Carlo method based on the simulation of a continuous Markov chain for solving Fredholm integral equations of the second kind.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; n 0 ; g [ ð0; 1; n 0 ¼ ð2 n mÞ 2 2 1. It is called the Jacobi over-relaxation method with relaxation parameter g [11,12]. Consider…”
Section: Numerical-probabilistic Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case for the large sparse LSAEs, they are more efficient than iterative or direct methods. For example the time of the algorithm (or computational complexity) of Gaussian elimination and Gauss -Jordan methods for solving LSAEs (1) is Oðn 3 Þ [12]. For iterative methods such as Jacobi, Gauss -Sidel and relaxation methods, the computational complexity is of order Oðn 2 kÞ in which k is the number of iterations [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation