1974
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2614(74)80109-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monte Carlo free energy estimates using non-Boltzmann sampling: Application to the sub-critical Lennard-Jones fluid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
945
0
3

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,261 publications
(978 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
945
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…35 For that purpose, a hexadecane/water simulation system box was taken from previous research, 36 which contained 80 n-hexadecane and 1104 TIP4P water molecules 37 ( Figure 1A). The system was equilibrated for 5 ns and simulated for another 15 ns under equilibrium conditions.…”
Section: ■ Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 For that purpose, a hexadecane/water simulation system box was taken from previous research, 36 which contained 80 n-hexadecane and 1104 TIP4P water molecules 37 ( Figure 1A). The system was equilibrated for 5 ns and simulated for another 15 ns under equilibrium conditions.…”
Section: ■ Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To estimate c we have used Turnbull's empirical rule that the surface free energy is proportional to the latent heat of melting [16]. The height of the free-energy barrier was computed with molecular dynamics, using the umbrella sampling scheme [17,18]. In this scheme we compute the free energy of a nucleus as a function of its size.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The common analysis is based on projecting MD (MC) trajectories onto a small number of coordinates using principal component analysis or calculating the populations along one or two physically significant reaction coordinates. 23,24 Differences, ∆F mn , are commonly calculated by thermodynamic integration (TI) over physical quantities such as the energy, temperature, and the specific heat 25,26 as well as nonphysical parameters [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] (free energy perturbation methods and umbrella and histogram analysis methods [35][36][37] are also included in this category, see ref 19 and references cited therein). This is a robust and highly versatile approach, which is used successfully for calculating the difference in the free energy of binding of two ligands to the active site of an enzyme.…”
Section: I1 the Role Of Free Energy In Structural Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%