2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.parco.2014.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monte Carlo domain decomposition for robust nuclear reactor analysis

Abstract: Monte Carlo (MC) neutral particle transport codes are considered the gold-standard for nuclear simulations, but they cannot be robustly applied to high-fidelity nuclear reactor analysis without accommodating several terabytes of materials and tally data. While this is not a large amount of aggregate data for a typical high performance computer, MC methods are only embarrassingly parallel when the key data structures are replicated for each processing element, an approach which is likely infeasible on future ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, Horelik, Siegel, Forget, and Smith (2014) explored several spatial domain decomposition methods and analyzed their effect on load imbalance. In summary, each of these groups identified load imbalance as a problem and proposed analysis and solutions that fit their specific needs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Horelik, Siegel, Forget, and Smith (2014) explored several spatial domain decomposition methods and analyzed their effect on load imbalance. In summary, each of these groups identified load imbalance as a problem and proposed analysis and solutions that fit their specific needs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any method aiming to simulate entire nuclear reactors in high fidelity must be able to map efficiently onto supercomputer architectures, where many separate computers are networked together and working in tight coordination to run a simulation [34,35,36]. Running on a supercomputer is necessary both to reduce the time to solution and to greatly increase the total amount of memory available for the simulation in order to allow a 3D full reactor core to be simulated with a sufficiently high resolution [18,37,38,39,40,41] . In order for a MOC or discrete ordinance (Sn) based simulation to utilize a supercomputer effectively, the domain of the reactor must be decomposed and distributed among the hundreds or thousands of computational nodes that form the supercomputer [25,26,29,30,31].…”
Section: Computational Parallelismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the transfer of rays between adjacent computational domains inside of a power iteration in TRRM is similar to the transfer of particles between domains in a domain decomposed MC simulation. In recent years there has been significant research into these MC communication models and costs [38,41,45,46,47,48] that were leveraged when developing the communication model used in ARRC. However, there are some key differences in communication requirements between Monte Carlo and TRRM that can sometimes lead to domain replication being preferable in Monte Carlo instead of domain decomposition (particularly when the geometry model and all tally data are small enough to fit on a single computational node).…”
Section: Computational Parallelismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite such advancements, high fidelity nuclear reactor simulations are still beyond immediate reach when one considers the need to account for temperature variations during operation and the necessity of tallying reaction rates over millions of regions for tracking core evolution. As part of the CASL project, progress has been made on the last front by using data decomposition [2], overlapping domain decomposition [3] or combinations of non-overlapping domain decomposition and replication [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%