2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1350-4487(02)00065-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monte Carlo determinations of the beta dose rate to tooth enamel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analyses of purified U and Th were performed by α-ray spectrometry. ESR/US ages were calculated with the ESR-DATA program (36), using an α efficiency (43) of 0.13 ± 0.02 and Monte Carlo β attenuation factors based on the thickness of the tooth enamel with outer layers removed (44). In addition, water content was estimated to be 3 wt% in the enamel, 10 wt% in the dentin and cement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analyses of purified U and Th were performed by α-ray spectrometry. ESR/US ages were calculated with the ESR-DATA program (36), using an α efficiency (43) of 0.13 ± 0.02 and Monte Carlo β attenuation factors based on the thickness of the tooth enamel with outer layers removed (44). In addition, water content was estimated to be 3 wt% in the enamel, 10 wt% in the dentin and cement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concentrations of potassium, uranium, thorium, and rubidium were quantified by inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), and were converted into dose rate based on data from Adamiec and Aitken (1998) and Marsh et al (2002). Past changes of moisture content are not predictable, so an error of 5% was applied to measured value to account for them.…”
Section: Optically-stimulated Luminescence (Osl) Datingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given this, we consider that measurements made of present-day radioactivity are sufficiently representative to derive long-term burial dose rates. Conversions to annual dose rates followed Aitken (1985; alpha and gamma) and Marsh et al (2002;beta), with dose rates attenuated for sediment size and paleomoisture contents as measured when sampled. Cosmic dose rates were determined following Prescott and Hutton (1994).…”
Section: Luminescencementioning
confidence: 78%