1982
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1982.0005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monte Carlo computer simulation of water–amino acid interactions

Abstract: The sensitivity of computer simulated solvent structures to changes in both non-bonded (Lennard-Jones) coefficients and partial atomic charges has been investigated with use of amino acid hydrate crystals in which the water structure is well defined experimentally. The polarizable electropole (p.e.) model of water has been extended to describe water-protein interactions; thus, the cooperative nature of the hydrogen bond (i.e. non-pair additive effects) is allowed for through a polarizable dipole. By means of M… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16,17 However, interpretation of the solvent density map is often complicated due to solvent mobility and disorder, and determination of only a limited number of well-ordered solvent sites may be possible. 16,18,19 Theoretical methods such as energy minimization, 20,21 Monte Carlo simulations, 22 and molecular dynamics simulations 15,[23][24][25][26][27][28] have been used for predicting water sites at a protein surface and calculating hydration energies. [29][30][31][32][33][34] In particular, molecular dynamics simulations have been used by several groups [29][30][31][32][33][34] to calculate the change in free energy associated with hydration of a cavity within a protein: the specific methods differ in detail, but essen-tially, the free energy is calculated from the energetic cost of removal of a water molecule from bulk solvent and the energetic gain of insertion of a water molecule into a cavity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,17 However, interpretation of the solvent density map is often complicated due to solvent mobility and disorder, and determination of only a limited number of well-ordered solvent sites may be possible. 16,18,19 Theoretical methods such as energy minimization, 20,21 Monte Carlo simulations, 22 and molecular dynamics simulations 15,[23][24][25][26][27][28] have been used for predicting water sites at a protein surface and calculating hydration energies. [29][30][31][32][33][34] In particular, molecular dynamics simulations have been used by several groups [29][30][31][32][33][34] to calculate the change in free energy associated with hydration of a cavity within a protein: the specific methods differ in detail, but essen-tially, the free energy is calculated from the energetic cost of removal of a water molecule from bulk solvent and the energetic gain of insertion of a water molecule into a cavity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous work which investigated structural aspects of water-biomolecule hydrate crystals, we extended the PE model for water (8) to describe water-protein interactions. In this paper, we investigate the extent ofnon-pair-additive effects, using Monte Carlo simulations on a variety ofwater-biomolecule systems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PE model has been extended previously to describe water-amino acid interactions by Goodfellow et at (8). Each solvent-amino acid interaction is described by a set of nonbonded (Lennard-Jones) coefficients together with a set of partial atomic charges centered at each nonhydrogen atom of the amino acid residue.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%