2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2020.164355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monte-Carlo calculation of production rates of cosmogenic radionuclides in a HPGe detector operating in the Modane underground laboratory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where tot,H and tot,0 indicate the flux of certain particles in the cosmic ray at altitudes H and sea level, respectively; p(H ) is the atmospheric pressure at altitude H [30,31], and L is the typical absorption length for a certain cosmic-ray component. It is generally considered that the production rates of cosmogenic activations are dominated by neutrons, so the absorption length of the neutron is a suitable choice [21,32]. Cosmogenic production rates are proportional to the neutron flux, and the same exponential correction can be applied to obtain the corresponding production rates at sea level,…”
Section: Experiments and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where tot,H and tot,0 indicate the flux of certain particles in the cosmic ray at altitudes H and sea level, respectively; p(H ) is the atmospheric pressure at altitude H [30,31], and L is the typical absorption length for a certain cosmic-ray component. It is generally considered that the production rates of cosmogenic activations are dominated by neutrons, so the absorption length of the neutron is a suitable choice [21,32]. Cosmogenic production rates are proportional to the neutron flux, and the same exponential correction can be applied to obtain the corresponding production rates at sea level,…”
Section: Experiments and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The copper used in the PPCGe detectors of the CDEX experiment leads to a crucial background contribution, which requires assessment due to cosmogenic activation in copper to establish the background model for the CDEX experiment. Although the production rates of cosmogenic activation in copper have been investigated via simulations and measurements, discrepancies exist among the results [17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Iron is confirmed to be an optimal shielding material, thanks to the lower production of secondary neutrons, but an optimized shielding structure using different materials is shown to be more effective, reducing by approximately one order of magnitude the production rates of the cosmogenic radioisotopes. • Calculations using GEANT4 and CONUS software packages and ACTIVIA (with the default input neutron spectrum) were used to quantify production rates and estimate the corresponding counting rates in the Obelix HPGe detector (with mass of 3.19 kg), operating in the Modane underground laboratory in France [99]. Interactions of the secondary cosmic nucleons for several components, including the Ge crystal, were considered to quantify the production of several isotopes.…”
Section: Activation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results shown in Table 6 were obtained considering the Gordon et al spectrum. • The calculations using GEANT4 and CONUS software packages and ACTIVIA to obtain production rates of radioisotopes and estimate the corresponding counting rates in the Obelix HPGe detector [99] (see Section 3) included also copper as it is used in the cold finger.…”
Section: Coppermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation