2014
DOI: 10.3103/s0027134914060034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monte Carlo calculation of dosimetry parameters for a brachytherapy source

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the 192 Ir model: GI192M11, a study was made by Perez-Calatayud et al, (2012) using the Geant3 Monte Carlo code [1], Geant4 was used by Granero et al, (2005) for the same source model [6]. The comparison was also made in the case of radial dose function with the results obtained for the source model BEBIG Ir2.A852 simulated by Granero et al, (2008) [7] and Belousov et al, (2014) [8]. The obtained results in this study were in good coherence with the published data.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the 192 Ir model: GI192M11, a study was made by Perez-Calatayud et al, (2012) using the Geant3 Monte Carlo code [1], Geant4 was used by Granero et al, (2005) for the same source model [6]. The comparison was also made in the case of radial dose function with the results obtained for the source model BEBIG Ir2.A852 simulated by Granero et al, (2008) [7] and Belousov et al, (2014) [8]. The obtained results in this study were in good coherence with the published data.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…A852 source model. The maximum difference was found to be within 1.51% compared with D. Granero et al, (2008) [7] and 0.50% if the comparison is made with Belousov et al, (2014) [8].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The first type is characterized by a gradually increasing radial dose function which reaches its maximum at the distance of 1 cm from the source; whereas the second type is characterized by a dose decrease with distance at small values of r. Among the type one sources are BEBIG GI192M11, Flexisource, Gammamed 12i, Gammamed plus, Microselectron V1 and V2, SPEC M19, Vari Source classic and Vary Source VS200; the type two sources are BEBIG Ir2.A95-2 and Buchler G0814. Values of the radial dose functions for source BEBIG Ir2.A95-2 were obtained by the authors [6], and taken from publication [7]; data for all other sources is taken from the database of Carleton University [8]. In all cases, the nonlinear least-squares fitting was performed using OriginPro software.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All expressions are compiled in such a way that the number of fitting parameters a 0 , a 1 ,.., would not exceed 7. In this research, we calculated the radial dose function for source BEBIGIr2.A95-2, performed fitting by formulas (1) and (4)(5)(6) for this source and 10 other sources with 192 Ir used as a radionuclide, as well as performed fitting by a sixth order polynomial and Gaussian function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5] The MCNP code is a standard method for brachytherapy recommended by TG-43 U1 and it is widely used to estimate its parameters. [4,6,7] In this work, the dose-rate constant, air-kerma strength and radial dose function were evaluated with Monte Carlo simulations for this new Iodine-125 brachytherapy source developed in Brazil, as a part of a larger project that will include experimental measurements in the future for data comparison.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%