2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11224-016-0776-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monte Carlo-based QSAR modeling of dimeric pyridinium compounds and drug design of new potent acetylcholine esterase inhibitors for potential therapy of myasthenia gravis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The obtained QSAR equations were of consistent statistical quality for sub‐training, calibration, test, and validation sets . In all the three equations, values of R 2 more than 0.7 indicated good fitted models and Q 2 more than 0.6 pointed toward good internal predictivity and stability of the developed models.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The obtained QSAR equations were of consistent statistical quality for sub‐training, calibration, test, and validation sets . In all the three equations, values of R 2 more than 0.7 indicated good fitted models and Q 2 more than 0.6 pointed toward good internal predictivity and stability of the developed models.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…With the best-preferred values of T* and N*, the pIC 50 (endpoint) for each split was computed and the developed QSAR models are as the following: 2 demonstrate that all generated QSAR models from the statistical point of view are appropriate and match the requirements of various validation criteria. The robustness of established QSAR models was demonstrated by the numerical value of R 2 and Q 2 values which were more than 0.5 and 0.7 47,48 . In addition, the numerical value of the R 2 m metric for the validation set of all designed QSAR models was satisfactory and follows the criteria suggested by Roy et al 49 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A flowchart of a Monte Carlo optimization cycle is presented by Sokolovic et al [26]. At first cycle, the CW(x) of features is randomly generated and then optimized based on the proposed objective function.…”
Section: Descriptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%