2001
DOI: 10.2307/3672373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Montane Rattlesnakes and Prescribed Fire

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prescribed burns in 2005 and 2006 also might influence the growth of this population. Substantial direct mortality from fire is uncommon in snakes (Russell et al 1999;Smith et al 2001;Webb and Shine 2008), although exceptions exist (Durbian 2006;Lyet et al 2009). Prescribed fire could have the desired effect of increasing the suitability of the habitat for the San Francisco gartersnake or its amphibian prey, resulting in increased abundance over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prescribed burns in 2005 and 2006 also might influence the growth of this population. Substantial direct mortality from fire is uncommon in snakes (Russell et al 1999;Smith et al 2001;Webb and Shine 2008), although exceptions exist (Durbian 2006;Lyet et al 2009). Prescribed fire could have the desired effect of increasing the suitability of the habitat for the San Francisco gartersnake or its amphibian prey, resulting in increased abundance over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to 1900, low intensity fires occurred on average every 6–7 years, as judged from fire scars on trees at Animas Mountain, whereas high intensity crown fires were less frequent [ 41 ]. We contrasted survival following low [ 42 ] and high intensity (2006) fires and employed three scenarios for context: (A) no fire, (B) low intensity fire, and (C) high intensity fire. Probability of each was determined using historical records [ 43 ], with survival estimated from mark-recapture data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…fire recurrence and time since fire) are not the only drivers affecting reptile communities in fire-prone ecosystems, and other processes, like habitat structure, biogeographic affinity, and food availability, operating at different spatial scales, might be equally important (Driscoll and Henderson, 2008;Pastro et al, 2013;Ferreira et al, 2016b). Besides the direct impact of fire on animals (i. e. mortality; Smith et al, 2001;Couturier et al, 2011), shifts in vegetation along postfire successional stages are important in order to characterize reptile communities in fire-prone ecosystems (Driscoll et al, 2012;Santos and Cheylan, 2013;Smith et al, 2013;Santos et al, 2016). The complex relationship between fire and vegetation structure (Nimmo et al, 2014) makes it advisable to incorporate vegetation factors into fire-history models to better understand the response of reptiles to fire (Santos et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%