2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00526-011-0405-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monotonicity and one-dimensional symmetry for solutions of −Δ p u = f(u) in half-spaces

Abstract: We prove a weak comparison principle in narrow domains for sub-super solutions to − p u = f (u) in the case 1 < p ≤ 2 and f locally Lipschitz continuous. We exploit it to get the monotonicity of positive solutions to − p u = f (u) in half spaces, in the case 2N +2 N +2 < p ≤ 2 and f positive. Also we use the monotonicity result to deduce some Liouville-type theorems. We then consider a class of sign-changing nonlinearities and prove a monotonicity and a one-dimensional symmetry result, via the same techniques … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
53
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where ϑ := σC 2 C 1 > 0 is sufficiently small when σ > 0 is sufficiently small. Applying again Lemma 2.1 of [15] it follows that C(R) (|∇u| + |∇u τ |) p−2 |∇w τ,ε | 2 dx = 0 for any R ≥ R 0 . This provides a contradiction exactly as in the case 1 < p < 2 so that the thesis follows also in the case p ≥ 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where ϑ := σC 2 C 1 > 0 is sufficiently small when σ > 0 is sufficiently small. Applying again Lemma 2.1 of [15] it follows that C(R) (|∇u| + |∇u τ |) p−2 |∇w τ,ε | 2 dx = 0 for any R ≥ R 0 . This provides a contradiction exactly as in the case 1 < p < 2 so that the thesis follows also in the case p ≥ 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…with σ := (α − γ)β + 1. We take α > 0 sufficiently large so that σ > 0 and ϑC 2 αC 1 < 2 −σ so that Lemma 2.1 of [15] apply and shows that L(R) = 0. ¿From this it follows that u ≤ v + ε for every ε > 0, hence u ≤ v. Arguing in the same way it follows that u ≥ v and this proves the uniqueness result.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Remark 16. Ifλ is given by (17) we are in the hypothesis of Lemma 15 for any x 0 ∈ R, since the difference wλ = u − uλ fulfills an equation of the type (12) and we can argue as in (16) to prove that, ∂u ∂ y (x 0 ,λ) > 0.…”
Section: Finallymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We believe that the techniques developed in [17] might also be useful in the fully nonlinear case, but this would in any case require u or |∇u| be bounded.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation