When performing simultaneous hypotheses testing is expected that the decisions obtained therein are logically consistent with each other. In this work, we find restrictions under which simultaneous Bayes tests meet logical conditions separately or jointly. It is shown that the conditions for the simultaneous tests meet these conditions alone are quite intuitive. However, when trying to obey the conditions jointly, we lose optimality. Furthermore, we evaluate the relationship between these tests and simultaneous Bayes tests generated by estimators, ie, we show that, under some conditions, to choose an estimator based on Bayes decision is equivalent to choosing a decision based on a Bayes test. Finally, we show that if we take a decision based on Maximum Likelihood Estimators, then that decision should be equal to taking a Bayes test and concluded that these decisions are admissible and obey the Likelihood Principle.