2009
DOI: 10.1109/tac.2009.2026926
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monotonic Target Assignment for Robotic Networks

Abstract: Abstract-Consider an equal number of mobile robotic agents and distinct target locations dispersed in an environment. Each agent has a limited communication range and either: 1) knowledge of every target position or 2) a finite-range sensor capable of acquiring target positions and no a priori knowledge of target positions. In this paper we study the following target assignment problem: design a distributed algorithm with which the agents divide the targets among themselves and, simultaneously, move to their u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A related problem has been investigated as the Weapon-Target Assignment (WTA) problem, in which vehicles are allowed to team up in order to enhance the probability of a favorable outcome in a target engagement. 33,34 Other related works address UAV taskassignment: [35][36][37][38] in this setup, targets locations are known and an assignment strategy is sought that maximizes a global performance metric such as success rate. Some other works, like this paper, address coverage and sensing tasks with only prior statistics on the operating environment.…”
Section: -12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A related problem has been investigated as the Weapon-Target Assignment (WTA) problem, in which vehicles are allowed to team up in order to enhance the probability of a favorable outcome in a target engagement. 33,34 Other related works address UAV taskassignment: [35][36][37][38] in this setup, targets locations are known and an assignment strategy is sought that maximizes a global performance metric such as success rate. Some other works, like this paper, address coverage and sensing tasks with only prior statistics on the operating environment.…”
Section: -12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the recent past, considerable efforts have been devoted to the problem of how to cooperatively assign and schedule tasks that are defined over an extended geographical area (Alighanbari and How, 2008;Arslan et al, 2007;Beard et al, 2002;Moore and Passino, 2007;Smith and Bullo, 2009). In these papers, the main focus is in developing distributed algorithms that operate with knowledge about the task locations and with limited communication between robots.…”
Section: A Static and Dynamic Vehicle Routingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By manipulating ρ the quality/efficiency trade-off may be tuned to suit user needs; we believe this to be more representative of our physical robots than directly relating task sparsity to some fixed range (e.g., based on communication radius, although cf. [15] for such a treatment).…”
Section: A Matrix Sparsity Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The similar underlying combinatorial task-assignment problems have also been tackled from a hybrid systems perspective (e.g., role assignment with preemption [13], and potential-field hybrid controllers with relaxed mutual exclusion constraints [14]). An important recent result is that of [15], who studied a class of problems in which assigned robots must remain at targets indefinitely, but for which important performance bounds under different environmental models could be identified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%