2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.03.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monotonic and cyclic behaviour of wood frame shear walls for mid-height timber buildings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0
6

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
13
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…An important issue regarding stiffness is that the shear stiffness obtained by the FPSW test (10kN) is almost twice as high as the experimental stiffness of Guíñez et al (2019)…”
Section: Design Procedures Of Buildings With Six and Ten Storiesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An important issue regarding stiffness is that the shear stiffness obtained by the FPSW test (10kN) is almost twice as high as the experimental stiffness of Guíñez et al (2019)…”
Section: Design Procedures Of Buildings With Six and Ten Storiesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is important to know the relationship (CEE) between the experimental models and the calibration of the MSTEW program in order to find the error percentages in which the CLT (Popovski et al 2011), LFTB (Guíñez et al 2019) and FPSW models in shear wall configurations are found. This represents a comparison parameter for energy dissipation, as illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Comparison Of Energy Dissipationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the wall was analyzed, comparative graphs were made, in order to evaluate the differences between the different wooden structures' configuration in contrast with the FPSW test. For example, compare walls that had the LFTB system (Guíñez et al 2019) with nails (ϕ3x70mm) every 100mm versus the CLT wall (Popovski et al 2011) with 10d annular ring nails per angle bracket. in contrast FPSW configuration, (see hysteretic envelope from Fig.…”
Section: Comparison Of Cyclic Test Curves Envelope Response and Stifmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar behavior has been found in connections of un-tensioned high-rise buildings simply because of large gravitational loads at the first stories. Indeed, recent investigations proofed significant increases in strength, stiffness and energy dissipation of components and the entire structure, which mainly has been attributed to the compression forces and frictions at the connections (Guíñez, F. et al, 2019).…”
Section: Latin American Journal Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%