2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jat.2008.04.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monotone Jacobi parameters and non-Szegő weights

Abstract: We relate asymptotics of Jacobi parameters to asymptotics of the spectral weights near the edges. Typical of our results is that for a n ≡ 1, b n = −Cn −β (0 < β < 2 3 ), one has dµ(x) = w(x) dx on (−2, 2), and near x = 2, w(x) = e −2Q(x) where(1 + O((2 − x))).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Much of the effort in the proof of Theorem 3 goes towards controlling the higher-order terms in (1.12), (1.13). Lest we neglect the most important special cases, and recalling that [6] described the case a n ≡ 1, b n = −Cn −β , we consider the case a n = 1 − Cn −τ , b n = 0 (1.18) and compute explicitly the expansion to order O(log(2 − x)).…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Much of the effort in the proof of Theorem 3 goes towards controlling the higher-order terms in (1.12), (1.13). Lest we neglect the most important special cases, and recalling that [6] described the case a n ≡ 1, b n = −Cn −β , we consider the case a n = 1 − Cn −τ , b n = 0 (1.18) and compute explicitly the expansion to order O(log(2 − x)).…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(note that for n = N 0 , the undefined quantity γ N 0 −1 (x) appears in some of the equations, but in a term multiplied by Φ N 0 −1 (x) = 0 so this doesn't present any ambiguity; to avoid undefined quantities let us set γ N 0 −1 (x) = 0). In the following proposition we use the argument of [6], starting from n = N 0 instead of n = 1; the estimates are proved in [6, Section 3] for the case b n ≡ 0 but, with the additional input of Lemma 2.3, the arguments work in our level of generality.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations