2007
DOI: 10.1109/tpami.2007.1049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MonoSLAM: Real-Time Single Camera SLAM

Abstract: Abstract-We present a real-time algorithm which can recover the 3D trajectory of a monocular camera, moving rapidly through a previously unknown scene. Our system, which we dub MonoSLAM, is the first successful application of the SLAM methodology from mobile robotics to the "pure vision" domain of a single uncontrolled camera, achieving real time but drift-free performance inaccessible to Structure from Motion approaches. The core of the approach is the online creation of a sparse but persistent map of natural… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
1,711
0
10

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3,247 publications
(1,848 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
1,711
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Common methods range from locating simple image corners (Cheng, Maimone, & Matthies, 2005;Nister et al, 2004) to using descriptive feature detectors such as scale invariant feature transform (SIFT) (Schleicher et al, 2007;Se, Lowe, & Little, 2001) or maximally stable extremal regions (MSER) (Matas, Chum, Urban, & Pajdla, 2004). Methods for matching features are equally as diverse in the literature, with some relying on feature patch template matching methods (Davison, Reid, Molton, & Stasse, 2007), correlation peaks (Cheng et al, 2005), or feature descriptor key matching (Se et al, 2001).…”
Section: Multiview Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Common methods range from locating simple image corners (Cheng, Maimone, & Matthies, 2005;Nister et al, 2004) to using descriptive feature detectors such as scale invariant feature transform (SIFT) (Schleicher et al, 2007;Se, Lowe, & Little, 2001) or maximally stable extremal regions (MSER) (Matas, Chum, Urban, & Pajdla, 2004). Methods for matching features are equally as diverse in the literature, with some relying on feature patch template matching methods (Davison, Reid, Molton, & Stasse, 2007), correlation peaks (Cheng et al, 2005), or feature descriptor key matching (Se et al, 2001).…”
Section: Multiview Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the heart of visual SLAM systems is an incremental state estimation filter, generally implemented as either an extended Kalman filter (EKF) (Davison et al, 2007) or particle filter (PF) (Eade & Drummond, 2006;Pupilli & Calway, 2006). In the EKF MonoSLAM approach (Davison et al, 2007), the EFK models the motion of the camera using a standard acceleration model.…”
Section: Visual Slammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the category of feature-based 6D SLAM are the visual SLAM methods, that is, the MonoSLAM system of Davison et al (Davison, Reid, Molton, & Stasse, 2007).…”
Section: Mapping Environments In Three Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simple correlation-based features, such as Harris corners [3] or Shi and Tomasi features [4], are of common use in vision-based SFM and SLAM; from the early uses of Harris himself to the popular work of Davison [5]. This kind of features can be robustly tracked when camera displacement is small and are tailored to real-time applications.…”
Section: A Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%