Monopolistic Competition Revisited

Chamberlin, Edward H.

doi:10.2307/2549607

Cited by 49 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Defined in terms of the Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) scheme, the 'industry' has been for a long time the generally accepted unit and level of analysis in I 0 economics (Bain, 1956;Scherer, 1980). Yet even economists (Chamberlin, 1951 ;Robinson, 1956) have questioned the imprecision in industry definition and the 'fuzziness' of industry boundaries in economic environments characterized by product differentiation and technological change.…”

Section: Observation One: No Industry Is Homogeneous!mentioning

confidence: 99%

RESEARCH ON STRATEGIC GROUPS: PROGRESS AND PROGNOSIS^[1]

Thomas

Venkatraman

1988

J Management Studies

276

185

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The progress made in strategic groups research is evaluated by identifying its relevance and importance to the field of strategic management. A classificatory scheme is developed using two dimensions: the operationalization of strategy; and the approach to group development. A review framework incorporating key analytical dimensions is drawn up to (a) develop a taxonomy for classifying the available empirical research on strategic groups; (b) assess the research and identify important summary patterns and (c) develop specific research directions from a stategic management perspective.

show abstract

Section: Observation One: No Industry Is Homogeneous!mentioning

confidence: 99%

RESEARCH ON STRATEGIC GROUPS: PROGRESS AND PROGNOSIS^[1]

Thomas

Venkatraman

1988

J Management Studies

276

185

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Papers containing useful descriptions of sternal pore areas in the genera quoted in the text. Chamberlin, 1964Chamberlin, 1930a;Verhoeff, 1938dEason, 1962;Matic & Darabantu, 1969Chamberlin, 1946c, 1953bVerhoeff, 1938c Folkmanova & Dobroruka, 1960 Minelli, 1982b207 Chamberlin, 194 1 b Crabill, 1968bAttems, 1952bCrabill, 1970Chamberlin, 1963, 1930bChamberlin, 1955-56 Pereira & Demange, 1991Lawrence, 1960 Hoffman & Pereira, 1991Crabill, 1968a;Verhoeff, , 1940Dobroruka, 1959, 1939Crabill, 1958;Chamberlin, , 1946dTurk, 1955Crabill, 195913;Camberlin, 1941a;Pereira & Coscarh, 1975-76 Attems, 1929Kaczmarek, 1962, Verhoeff, 1934aChamberlin, 1957;Crabill, 1960a;Demange, 1963;Pereira, 1981bPereira, , 1984aTurk, 1955Archey, 1936Attems, , 1953Chamberlin, 1944aChamberlin, , 1950bChamberlin, , 1953aDemange, 1963;Lawrence, 1960;Verhoeff, 1939a, 195 1 Crabill, 1960…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The sternal pore areas of geophilomorph centipedes (Chilopoda: Geophilomorpha)

Turcato

1995

Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Most geophilomorph centipedes have segmental clusters of exocrine glands whose opening pores are arranged in more or less well-defined sternal pore areas. We describe here the cuticular structures forming and/or accompanying the gland openings on the sternites and the shape of the pore areas along the body axis in representatives of most geophilomorph families. The cuticular ring around the pore may exhibit either of two forms. In Himantariidae (Himunturium) and in Dignathodontidae (Heniu) the ring looks like a continuous ribbon with a visible suture, whereas in the representatives of the remaining families no suture is seen.As to the distribution of the pores on ventral surface of the body, we record the presence of pores on the last leg-bearing segment of Clinopodes jkzvidus, whereas that segment was described as poreless in all geophilomorphs. We also provide a taxonomic survey of shape and distribution of pore areas in the individual families, where the pore areas may take very different shapes that we regard as transformational homologues. As for the segmental distribution of sternal pore areas, there is a considerable amount of complexity along the trunk of geophilomorph centipedes, in contrast to the apparently uniform trunk structure. Q 199.5 The Linnean Society of London ADDITIONAL KEY WORDS:-homologyserial homologypositional homology.

show abstract

“…By the early 1950's, Chamberlin (1951Chamberlin ( , 1953 himself accepted the spatial model as the more useful of the two polar cases.…”

Section: Lettingmentioning

confidence: 99%

The new industrial organization and the economic analysis of modern markets

Schmalensee¹

1983

Advances in Economic Theory

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Monopolistic Competition Revisited

Cited by 49 publications

References 0 publications

RESEARCH ON STRATEGIC GROUPS: PROGRESS AND PROGNOSIS^[1]

RESEARCH ON STRATEGIC GROUPS: PROGRESS AND PROGNOSIS^[1]

The sternal pore areas of geophilomorph centipedes (Chilopoda: Geophilomorpha)

The new industrial organization and the economic analysis of modern markets

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Monopolistic Competition Revisited

Cited by 49 publications

References 0 publications

RESEARCH ON STRATEGIC GROUPS: PROGRESS AND PROGNOSIS[1]

RESEARCH ON STRATEGIC GROUPS: PROGRESS AND PROGNOSIS[1]

The sternal pore areas of geophilomorph centipedes (Chilopoda: Geophilomorpha)

The new industrial organization and the economic analysis of modern markets

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

RESEARCH ON STRATEGIC GROUPS: PROGRESS AND PROGNOSIS^[1]

RESEARCH ON STRATEGIC GROUPS: PROGRESS AND PROGNOSIS^[1]