1994
DOI: 10.1016/0920-5632(94)90443-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monopole clusters and critical dynamics in four-dimensional U(1)

Abstract: We investigate monopoles in four-dimensional compact U(1) with Wilson action. We focus our attention on monopole clusters as they can be identified unambiguously contrary to monopole loops. We locate the clusters and determine their properties near the U(1) phase transition. The Coulomb phase is characterized by several small clusters, whereas in the confined phase the small clusters coalesce to one large cluster filling up the whole system. We find that clusters winding around the periodic lattice are absent … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results were presented in support of this view by switching to spherical lattices with trivial homotopy group where such wrapping loops are no more topologically stabilized [26,27,28,29]. But on spherical lattices equivalent to L = 26 at γ = −0.2, double peak structures have recently been reported to reappear [20,21], corroborating earlier observations with periodic boundary conditions at γ = 0: the suppression of monopole loop penetration through the lattice surface turned out to be incapable of preventing the incriminated double peak signal to show up on large lattices, to say L = 32 [30,31,32].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Results were presented in support of this view by switching to spherical lattices with trivial homotopy group where such wrapping loops are no more topologically stabilized [26,27,28,29]. But on spherical lattices equivalent to L = 26 at γ = −0.2, double peak structures have recently been reported to reappear [20,21], corroborating earlier observations with periodic boundary conditions at γ = 0: the suppression of monopole loop penetration through the lattice surface turned out to be incapable of preventing the incriminated double peak signal to show up on large lattices, to say L = 32 [30,31,32].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…But the issue is important, as whatever is interesting in the compact lattice QED is essentially related to the monopoles: The phase transition itself is known to be associated with the occurence of magnetic monopoles being topological excitations of the theory [6][7][8]. Modifications of the monopole contribution to the action have appreciable consequences for its position [9] and properties [10]. The long distance force in the confinement phase [11,12] and the chiral symmetry breaking [13] are best understood in terms of the monopole condensate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large (infrared) clusters which percolate through the lattice and wrap around the boundaries of lattice are formed by the longest monopole loop L loops . The method of numerical computations of the monopole world line in four dimension is explained in [16]. If the physical lattice volume is large enough, the small clusters and the large clusters are separated.…”
Section: Zero Modes Of Overlap Fermions Instantons and Monopoles Mamentioning
confidence: 99%