2010
DOI: 10.5194/angeo-28-2027-2010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monopolar and bipolar auroral electric fields and their effects

Abstract: Abstract. Most of the high-altitude auroral electric fields observed by CLUSTER can be classified into monopolar and bipolar structures. The observations associate monopolar electric fields with polar cap boundary arcs, while bipolar fields tend to be linked to discrete arcs within the auroral oval and to polar cap arcs. The present paper proposes an explanation for this association based on a simple model of the magnetotail configuration and kinetic model computations. The paper introduces a quasi-electrostat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(66 reference statements)
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, in a one‐dimensional planar interface (an assumption that is now known to be correct to within a few degrees of magnetic field tilt) in which time variations are slow (which is justified as well), Ampères Law states that In this way, the FACs can be computed. Figure 5d indicates z < 0 on the lobe side and z > 0 on the plasma sheet side of the structure, which agrees with the particle observations and also with the nature of the monopolar potential profile [ De Keyser et al , 2010]. Again, this computation differs from that of Johansson et al [2006, Figure 3], who do not account for boundary motion.…”
Section: Observations Of a Polar Cap Boundary Arcsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, in a one‐dimensional planar interface (an assumption that is now known to be correct to within a few degrees of magnetic field tilt) in which time variations are slow (which is justified as well), Ampères Law states that In this way, the FACs can be computed. Figure 5d indicates z < 0 on the lobe side and z > 0 on the plasma sheet side of the structure, which agrees with the particle observations and also with the nature of the monopolar potential profile [ De Keyser et al , 2010]. Again, this computation differs from that of Johansson et al [2006, Figure 3], who do not account for boundary motion.…”
Section: Observations Of a Polar Cap Boundary Arcsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Quasi‐stationary magnetosphere‐ionosphere coupling models are able to describe both large‐scale aurora [ Chiu and Schulz , 1978; Lyons , 1980; Chiu and Cornwall , 1980] and smaller‐scale discrete arcs [ Lyons , 1981; Echim et al , 2007, 2008; De Keyser and Echim , 2010; De Keyser et al , 2010]. These models are based on the concept of a DC electric circuit connecting a magnetospheric generator to an ionospheric load viafield‐aligned currents; changes in the auroral circuit produced by variations in the generator or by modifications of the ionospheric conductivity are considered to be rather slow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The U-or S-shaped potential drop produces the well known inverted-V structure in particle spectrograms, respectively for precipitating electrons at low altitude and for outflowing ions at high altitudes. An analytical quasi-stationary analysis has been recently proposed by De Keyser et al (2010). The downward quasi-static acceleration of electrons excites optical emissions in the ionosphere and leads to the formation of elongated and relatively stable discrete auroral arcs (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The source of the precipitating electron is expected to be in the high-altitude boundary layers, as predicted from a transport model along magnetic field lines. Finally, it is suggested that these acceleration structures could result from electrostatic potentials generated at the interface between the magnetopause boundary layers and the lobes [12][13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%