2001
DOI: 10.1006/zjls.2001.0253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monophyly and affinities of albanerpetontid amphibians (Temnospondyli; Lissamphibia)

Abstract: Tile Albanerpetontidae are Middle Jurassic-Miocene amphibians that have variously been regarded as caudates (salamanders), a clade distinct from caudates, or incertae sedis lissamphibians. Here I test for monophyly of the Albanerpetontidae and examine the affinities of the group, within the framework of a more inclusive Temnospondyli, by performing a cladistic analysis using 59 informative characters scored for four non-lissamphibian temnospondyl genera, stem-and crown-clade caudates, salientians (frogs), gymn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(103 reference statements)
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2008b) in the temnospondyl part of the cladogram is that albanerpetontids are placed outside Batrachia (frogs and salamanders) and that they are not the sister group of Caudata. This position of albanerpetontids is in agreement with Gardner (2001). Our results corroborate the monophyly of Karauridae and confirm the previous placement of Karauridae as the sister group of crown‐group salamanders (Urodela; Milner, 1994; Gao & Shubin, 2003; Evans et al ., 2005).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…(2008b) in the temnospondyl part of the cladogram is that albanerpetontids are placed outside Batrachia (frogs and salamanders) and that they are not the sister group of Caudata. This position of albanerpetontids is in agreement with Gardner (2001). Our results corroborate the monophyly of Karauridae and confirm the previous placement of Karauridae as the sister group of crown‐group salamanders (Urodela; Milner, 1994; Gao & Shubin, 2003; Evans et al ., 2005).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…With the exception of crocodyliforms, all other European groups affected by high extinction rates (squamates, mammals, dinosaurs) are exclu sively terrestrial, whereas among crocodyliforms both terrestrial (atoposaurid) and aquatic (hylaeochampsid) taxa were eliminated. Conversely, amphibians – including predominantly aquatic (batrachosauroidids, discoglossids, palaeobatrachids) or secretive (albanerpetontids; Gardner 2001 ; Gardner and Böhme 2008 ; Maddin et al 2013 ) forms – show high rates of survival, again similar to the pattern described for North America (e.g., Sheehan and Fastovsky 1992 ; Wilson et al 2014b ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The distribution patterns identified for the extant taxa are also confirmed by the latest known occurrences in extinct ones. Animal and plant groups that were already distinct at the end-Triassic, but were only lost after the end-Cretaceous mass extinction include the Bennettitales 20 , Albanerpetonidae 21 , and possibly the Meiolaniidae 22 . Their occurrences confirm the refugial function of both the large northern landmasses and the lesser southern continents and islands (e.g., Australia, New Caledonia).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%