1995
DOI: 10.1016/0022-328x(94)24773-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mononuclear(η6-arene)ruthenium(II) and (η5-pentamethllcyclopentadienyl)rhodium(III) and binuclear ruthenium(II)-platimum(II) and ruthenium(II)-rhodium(I) complexes containing 2-(diphenylphosphino)pyridine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
5
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compounds 11 and 12 are soluble in chlorinated solvents, acetone, methanol, and, to a minor extent, benzene to give air-sensitive solutions. The 31 P{ 1 H} NMR spectra of 11 and 12 in CDCl 3 solution show singlets at δ 27.44 and δ 23.20 ppm, respectively, and support a structure with head-to-head bridging Ph 2 PPy ligands . As expected, in the 1 H NMR spectra in CDCl 3 solution, the 6-hydrogen of the pyridine ring is shifted to higher frequency (δ 9.39 and 9.15 ppm, respectively) with respect to 1 …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Compounds 11 and 12 are soluble in chlorinated solvents, acetone, methanol, and, to a minor extent, benzene to give air-sensitive solutions. The 31 P{ 1 H} NMR spectra of 11 and 12 in CDCl 3 solution show singlets at δ 27.44 and δ 23.20 ppm, respectively, and support a structure with head-to-head bridging Ph 2 PPy ligands . As expected, in the 1 H NMR spectra in CDCl 3 solution, the 6-hydrogen of the pyridine ring is shifted to higher frequency (δ 9.39 and 9.15 ppm, respectively) with respect to 1 …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The Ir−Hg bond length is comparable with the value of 2.618 Å found for the complexes [Cl 2 Hg(μ-Cl) 2 HgIr(CO)Cl(dpm)(μ-dpm)AuCl] (dpm =diphenylphosphinomethane) and [Ir(COD)(EpTT) 2 HgCl] 2 (EpTT = C 2 H 5 N 3 - p -CH 3 C 6 H 4 ) and longer than the value reported for the complex [IrCl 2 (CO)(PPh 3 ) 2 (HgX)] (X = Cl, Br) (Ir−Hg(Cl) = 2.570(1) Å, Ir−Hg(Br) = 2.578(2) Å). The metal−metal bond distance is shorter than the nonbonded P···N separations (P(1)···N(1) = 2.721 Å and P(2)···N(2) = 2.703 Å); the latter is in the range found for other Ph 2 PPy-bridged complexes 12b. Bond distances and angles for the coordinated Ph 2 PPy are nearly alike, as are the P−M−M−N torsion angles P(1)−Ir−Hg−N(1) = 32.2(4)° and P(2)−Ir−Hg−N(2) = −28.9(4)°.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The chemistry of half-sandwich η 6 -arene-ruthenium complexes has been widely developed in the past decade, in part due to their catalytic potential, but also due to their usefulness in the synthesis of other Ru(0) and Ru(II) complexes. In particular, (arene)ruthenium(II) complexes of the type [(η 6 -arene)RuCl 2 (PR 3 )] containing aryl or alkyl phosphine as ancillary ligands have been extensively studied, owing to their role as effective precursors for a variety of catalytic and stoichiometric organic transformations. , Special interest is also currently devoted to complexes stabilized by heterobifunctional phospines bearing a hard (N, O) donor atom, since these ligands show interesting hemilabile properties. In contrast, the chemistry of analogous (arene)ruthenium(II) complexes containing unsaturated phosphines is relatively unexplored. Recently, Nelson and co-workers have reported (arene)Ru(II) derivatives with vinyl and allyl phosphines and 3,4-dimethyl-1-phenylphosphole, showing interesting reactivity with some of them. , Thus, they found that complexes (η 6 -arene)RuCl 2 (DPVP)] (DPVP = diphenylvinylphosphine) undergo a novel KO t Bu-promoted hydroalkylation to produce tethered phosphinopropylarene-ruthenium(II) compounds .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%