2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.04.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monolithic crowns fracture analysis: The effect of material properties, cusp angle and crown thickness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This might be related to the occlusal thickness as described in a previous study. 13 A second possible cause could be the thickness of the restoration as explained by an investigation of Shahmoradi et al (2020), 30 who claimed that the decreased load of crack initiation in thinner specimens of thickness 0.7 mm may be related to increased flexural and tensile stress on the intaglio surface of the crown which can potentiate the crack initiation. 30 A previous study showed that the calculated tensile stresses at the internal surface of the loaded and bonded ceramic crowns increased proportionally to cement thickness (8 times, from 50 to 500 µm).…”
Section: Rana Ashrafmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This might be related to the occlusal thickness as described in a previous study. 13 A second possible cause could be the thickness of the restoration as explained by an investigation of Shahmoradi et al (2020), 30 who claimed that the decreased load of crack initiation in thinner specimens of thickness 0.7 mm may be related to increased flexural and tensile stress on the intaglio surface of the crown which can potentiate the crack initiation. 30 A previous study showed that the calculated tensile stresses at the internal surface of the loaded and bonded ceramic crowns increased proportionally to cement thickness (8 times, from 50 to 500 µm).…”
Section: Rana Ashrafmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 A second possible cause could be the thickness of the restoration as explained by an investigation of Shahmoradi et al (2020), 30 who claimed that the decreased load of crack initiation in thinner specimens of thickness 0.7 mm may be related to increased flexural and tensile stress on the intaglio surface of the crown which can potentiate the crack initiation. 30 A previous study showed that the calculated tensile stresses at the internal surface of the loaded and bonded ceramic crowns increased proportionally to cement thickness (8 times, from 50 to 500 µm). 31 The cement effect could be attributed to the lower elasctic modulus compared to that of the ceramics (6.3 GPa and 64 GPa) and the resin cement shrinkage stresses could be more influential by increasing the cement thickness.…”
Section: Rana Ashrafmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since, crowns with thicker margins, smaller cusp angle and totally bonded are recommended to reduce the prosthesis failure susceptibility (Zhang et al, 2016 ). This can be justified because a lower crown thickness and higher cusp angle promotes a lower crack initiation load (Shahmoradi et al, 2020 ). However, these information are not available for feldspathic ceramic CAD/CAM crowns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 However, its flexural strength of 470 MPa and fracture toughness of 2.54 MPa has led to questioning the use of lithium disilicate restorations in the posterior region, 11 where occlusal loads are higher 12 and materials with higher flexural strength and fracture toughness such as monolithic zirconia have been preferred. 13,14 Moreover, there is a widespread assumption that e.max lithium disilicate glass ceramic with a thickness less than 1 mm is more susceptible to catastrophic fracture, 15 which leads to more invasive tooth preparations or avoidance of the material.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%