Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2022.105461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monolayer (2D) or spheroids (3D) cell cultures for nanotoxicological studies? Comparison of cytotoxicity and cell internalization of nanoparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation is supported by studies demonstrating a higher internalization of nanocarriers in HeLa (human cervical cancer cell line), MCF-7, and MDA-MB-231 (human breast cancer cell lines) cells grown as spheroids compared to 2D cultures. 7 Influence of GO flake size and functionalization on transfection efficiency in 3D spheroids…”
Section: Biomaterials Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This observation is supported by studies demonstrating a higher internalization of nanocarriers in HeLa (human cervical cancer cell line), MCF-7, and MDA-MB-231 (human breast cancer cell lines) cells grown as spheroids compared to 2D cultures. 7 Influence of GO flake size and functionalization on transfection efficiency in 3D spheroids…”
Section: Biomaterials Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Therefore, cellular spheroids have become a complex heterogeneous model with cell-cell interactions and a gradient of oxygen, pH, and nanoparticle concentration between the outermost layers and the centre of mass, which is more representative of reality. 2,6,7 Moreover, cells arranged in spheroidal structures (spheroids) within 3D culture systems have been observed to exhibit a more realistic phenotype compared to cells grown in conventional 2D monolayer cultures. 8 In the last decade, gene therapy has gained increasing interest due to its high potential for the effective treatment of cancer, cardiovascular diseases, rare infections and genetic diseases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2D cell cultures are frequently used in the literature for drug screening and evaluation of nanoparticles, but several studies show that this resource can be flawed in several points such as cell function, cell–matrix and cell–cell interaction, changes in cell shape, cells responses and do not efficiently mimic the biological tissue behavior and response to treatment. [ 52 ] The safety profile of our nanoparticles was therefore also evaluated in MCTS 3D model, as shown in Figure . All the concentrations tested were shown to be nontoxic in the first 24 h, with viability greater than 70%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This behavior is attributed to a great absorption capacity of nanoparticles in spheroids and for more efficiently mimicking the complexity of the TME and cell-cell and cell-ECM interactions. [52,53]…”
Section: Nanoparticles Biocompatibility In 2d and 3d Culturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…She gave an excellent presentation comparing the cellular effects of ions and nanoparticles, with an example of her research linked. 8 Additionally, I leveraged my experience in implementing bioassays and cellular and molecular biology tools. Gradually, my research focus began to center on Nanotoxicology.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%