Monographiæ phanerogamarum :Prodromi nunc continuatio, nunc revisio /auctoribus Alphonso et Casimir de Candolle aliisque botanicis ultra memoratis. Vol. primum-[nonum].

Candolle, Alphonse de; Candolle, C.

doi:10.5962/bhl.title.45961

Cited by 17 publications

(28 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Key publications, in which many species of Boea were described, are the works by Brown (1839Brown ( , 1840 and Clarke (1883). The most important recent work on the Boea group is that by Burtt (1984), in which the generic concepts formed around a twisted-fruited Boea and a straight-fruited Paraboea were profoundly modified with new generic concepts based on indumentum type rather than on the fruit twisting.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Generic recircumscription in the Loxocarpinae (Gesneriaceae), as inferred by phylogenetic and morphological data

Puglisi

Yao

Milne

et al. 2016

TAXON

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Loxocarpinae, also known as the “Boea group”, are the subtribe of Gesneriaceae which includes Boea and a number of segregated genera and close relatives. This group currently comprises over 200 species in 15 genera. Here we present the most up‐to‐date phylogeny, covering all the genera known to belong to the group, based on Bayesian inference and parsimony of the nuclear ITS and the plastid regions trnL‐trnF (intron and spacer) and ndhF‐trnLUAG (spacers). The results show discrepancies between the current generic delimitation in the subtribe and the clades delineated by the phylogeny. As a result Boea, Damrongia, Paraboea and Streptocarpus are recircumscribed in an attempt to establish a more natural classification and new combinations are made. The new genus Middletonia is described.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Generic recircumscription in the Loxocarpinae (Gesneriaceae), as inferred by phylogenetic and morphological data

Puglisi

Yao

Milne

et al. 2016

TAXON

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…They are characterized by a syncarpous ovary with two to several ovules per carpel and by a loculicidal (in Chloroxylon) or septifragal (in Flindersia) capsule with winged seeds. Affinities of these two genera have been uncertain, but because of the similarity of their fruits and seeds to those of Cedrela, early botanists (de Candolle, 1824(de Candolle, , 1878Bentham and Hooker, 1862) included them in Meliaceae. Because of their glandular-punctate leaves, Engler (1877Engler ( , 1931 placed both in Rutaceae, in which Flindersia was recognized by its recent monographer (Hartley, 1969).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Phylogenetic relationships of Rutaceae: a cladistic analysis of the subfamilies using evidence from RBC and ATP sequence variation

Chase

Morton

Kallunki

1999

American J of Botany

160

145

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sequence data for plastid rbcL and atpB from members of Anacardiaceae, Burseraceae, Cneoraceae, Meliaceae, Ptaeroxylaceae, Rutaceae, and Simaroubaceae were analyzed cladistically to evaluate the familial and subfamilial circumscriptions of Rutaceae. Taxa representing all subfamilies and tribes were sampled. The analysis shows that Rutaceae are paraphyletic, with Spathelia and Dictyoloma (Rutaceae), Harrisonia (Simaroubaceae), Cneorum (Cneoraceae), and Ptaeroxylon (Ptaeroxylaceae) forming a clade sister to all other Rutaceae. Circumscription of Rutaceae to include all of these taxa is recommended. This analysis indicates that Simaroubaceae and Meliaceae are the outgroups closest to Rutaceae. Correlation of the molecular phylogenies with biochemical data indicates that chemotaxonomic information is more reliable than fruit type as an indicator of familial and subfamilial circumscriptions. The subfamilial classification needs revision; none of the subfamilies of more than one genus is monophyletic.

show abstract

“…All this information suggests this specimen is part of the original material used by Planchon and is selected as the lectotype. Some publications (Planchon, 1887;Gagnepain, 1911aGagnepain, , 1912Gagnepain, , 1950, have written the specific epithet as "martini ", but this is correctable to "martinii " (see Ampelocissus harmandii).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Nomenclatural notes on species of Asian Vitaceae

Trias‐Blasi

Parnell

Watson

2017

TAXON

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Lectotypifications, neotypifications, epitypifications, and nomenclatural corrections are provided for fifty-eight Asian Vitaceae names (excluding those belonging to Tetrastigma) for the forthcoming floristic account in the Flora of Thailand. A total of fifty-four lectotypes, three neotypes, and one epitype are designated here and two nomenclatural clarifications and corrections are also proposed.

show abstract

Monographiæ phanerogamarum :Prodromi nunc continuatio, nunc revisio /auctoribus Alphonso et Casimir de Candolle aliisque botanicis ultra memoratis. Vol. primum-[nonum].

Cited by 17 publications

References 0 publications

Generic recircumscription in the Loxocarpinae (Gesneriaceae), as inferred by phylogenetic and morphological data

Generic recircumscription in the Loxocarpinae (Gesneriaceae), as inferred by phylogenetic and morphological data

Phylogenetic relationships of Rutaceae: a cladistic analysis of the subfamilies using evidence from RBC and ATP sequence variation

Nomenclatural notes on species of Asian Vitaceae

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About