2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.09.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monofermentation of grass silage under mesophilic conditions: Measurements and mathematical modeling with ADM 1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
30
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Lantz 48 investigated three types of manure-based 1-6 GWh y -1 biogas plants with 35 -290 kW el installed electrical capacity and found that none of them was profitable under Swedish market conditions. Hochloff and Braun 14 also concluded that none of their scenarios would be profitable without the German flexibility premium, and there is no such incentive in Sweden.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lantz 48 investigated three types of manure-based 1-6 GWh y -1 biogas plants with 35 -290 kW el installed electrical capacity and found that none of them was profitable under Swedish market conditions. Hochloff and Braun 14 also concluded that none of their scenarios would be profitable without the German flexibility premium, and there is no such incentive in Sweden.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 ADM1 has been applied to various substrates, e.g. grass silage, cattle manure and agricultural substrates, [34][35][36][37] and has been modified and extended by a great number of research groups. [38][39][40][41][42] Several studies report good model performance.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ADMl parameters are set to standard values, except for the parameterŝ s,c4, ^m,pro, ^m,ac, ^i,NH3 and k"_h2, as recommended in Wichern et al ( , 2009. The characterization of the ADMl input stream is based on the following measurements, which have been performed for all substrates.…”
Section: The Biogas Plantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen & Hashimoto, 1980;Kiely et al, 1997;Kalfas et al, 2006;Sosnowski et al, 2007;Boubaker & ridha, 2008;Liu et al, 2008;Vavilin et al, 2008;Qu et al, 2009) or waste water treatment (e.g. Batstone et al, 2002;Feng et al, 2006;Tomei et al, 2008;Boubaker & ridha, 2008), not so many results can be found on modeling of agricultural biogas production (Hill & Barth, 1977;Simeonov et al, 1996;Angelidaki et al, 1999) and only a few consider the digestion of energy crops (Wichern et al, 2008(Wichern et al, & 2009Beierlein et al, 2010). The developed models, in particular the most complex ADM1, show high complexity and include a great number of parameters, which improve the accuracy of the model on one hand, but create implementation difficulties on the other hand as in many cases all data required by such models cannot be collected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%