2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.07.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monodisperse versus Polydisperse Ultrasound Contrast Agents: In Vivo Sensitivity and safety in Rat and Pig

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
(97 reference statements)
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, commercial, clinically approved microbubbles are polydisperse. However, recent papers show that monodisperse microbubbles have a more uniform acoustic response and an increased imaging sensitivity ( Segers et al, 2018 ; Helbert et al, 2020 ), which will also improve the reproducibility and controllability of USMB therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, commercial, clinically approved microbubbles are polydisperse. However, recent papers show that monodisperse microbubbles have a more uniform acoustic response and an increased imaging sensitivity ( Segers et al, 2018 ; Helbert et al, 2020 ), which will also improve the reproducibility and controllability of USMB therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suboptimal match between ultrasound spectral content and bubble size distribution motivates the development and use of monodisperse microbubbles. The increased sensitivity of monodisperse bubbles with respect to polydisperse ones has first been demonstrated for molecular imaging using low bubble concentrations [7] and later for contrast imaging in vitro [8] and in vivo [9]. In particular, Segers et al [8] report sensitivity increase by two and three orders of magnitude for the fundamental and second harmonic, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since these monodisperse microbubbles can guarantee a more consistent microbubble behaviour they could make cavitation-based therapies much more predictable and efficient. Helbert, et al showed that the use of monodisperse microbubbles in rats and guinea pigs resulted in an imaging sensitivity (mean echo power per injected bubble) that was at least 10 and 15 times higher in rats and pigs, respectively, compared to the polydisperse control [391]. These findings imply that the use of monodisperse microbubbles is promising for diagnostic but also therapeutic applications.…”
Section: Monodisperse Microbubblesmentioning
confidence: 99%