1984
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.81.1.272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monoclonal antibodies detect the conservation of muscarinic cholinergic receptor structure from Drosophila to human brain and detect possible structural homology with alpha 1-adrenergic receptors.

Abstract: Muscarinic cholinergic receptors isolated from Drosophila heads, rat and human brain, dog heart, and monkey ciliary muscle were examined for structural similarities/differences by utilizing isoelectric focusing, sodium dodecyl sulfate/polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and monoclonal antibody crossreactivity. Muscarinic The muscarinic cholinergic receptor mediates various central nervous system activities as well as the function of the parasympathetic side of the autonomic nervous system, including heart ra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…solubilized mAChRs from those two tissues persists (Berrie et al, 1985b), but in general the findings support the idea that there is little to distinguish the binding domains of the isolated receptors from cortex and myocardium (Laduron et al, 1981;Venter et al, 1984;Schreiber & Sokolovsky, 1985). Nonetheless, it would probably be premature to dismiss the notion of muscarinic receptor isotypes on this basis since (1) Pz high and low affinity binding sites survive solubilization from the cortex (Berrie et al, 1985c), whereas high affinity sites actually appear after solubilization of the heart, and (2) the affinity of Pz for mAChRs from the rat lacrimal gland is lowered after solubilization (M. Keen et al, unpublished observations), thereby enhancing the selectivity of the drug in this case.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…solubilized mAChRs from those two tissues persists (Berrie et al, 1985b), but in general the findings support the idea that there is little to distinguish the binding domains of the isolated receptors from cortex and myocardium (Laduron et al, 1981;Venter et al, 1984;Schreiber & Sokolovsky, 1985). Nonetheless, it would probably be premature to dismiss the notion of muscarinic receptor isotypes on this basis since (1) Pz high and low affinity binding sites survive solubilization from the cortex (Berrie et al, 1985c), whereas high affinity sites actually appear after solubilization of the heart, and (2) the affinity of Pz for mAChRs from the rat lacrimal gland is lowered after solubilization (M. Keen et al, unpublished observations), thereby enhancing the selectivity of the drug in this case.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…(2005a, 2005b) also made a surprising observation; contrary to expectations, invertebrate genomes do not contain sequences belonging to the TAAR family of GPCRs in spite of the fact that trace amine binding has been demonstrated in several invertebrate species including Drosophila melanogaster (Saudou et al ., 1990), honeybee ( Apis mellifera ) (Blenau et al ., 2000; Grohmann et al ., 2003) and molluscs (Gerhardt et al ., 1997). This is in contrast to the extensive inter‐species homology reported for adrenoceptors and for muscarinic cholinergic receptors (Venter et al ., 1984; Pelacios et al ., 1989).…”
Section: Trace Amine‐associated Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ACh, an archaic signaling molecule, has been found in prokaryotes, plants, and mammals (Wessler et al 1999), and the gene sequence or protein structures for ChAT, mACh receptor, and AChE are highly similar among Drosophila, rats, and humans (Venter et al 1984;Oda 1999;Wessler et al 1999). This strong degree of conservation is not surprising because the pathway is integral in basic cellular functions, including cytoskeletal and membrane organization, calcium regulation, mitogenesis, and cell differentiation and migration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%