2012
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.85.045109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MonoclinicM1phase of VO2: Mott-Hubbard versus band insulator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
54
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
2
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The exact nature of the metal-insulator transition has remained elusive and is of continuing scientific interest; recent work has emphasized the significance of electronelectron interactions associated with a Mott-Hubbard transition and/or electron-phonon interactions associated with a Peierls mechanism. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] The value of τ c can be changed by substitutional doping, for example by replacing some vanadium by tungsten, 10 and wellcrystallized W x V 1-x O 2 films with x ≈ 0.02 can have τ c ≈ 20 °C; 11 doping with atomic hydrogen is another possibility. 12 The magnitude of the resistance change at τ c depends on the degree of crystallinity, and epitaxial films can display a difference of three to four orders of magnitude.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exact nature of the metal-insulator transition has remained elusive and is of continuing scientific interest; recent work has emphasized the significance of electronelectron interactions associated with a Mott-Hubbard transition and/or electron-phonon interactions associated with a Peierls mechanism. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] The value of τ c can be changed by substitutional doping, for example by replacing some vanadium by tungsten, 10 and wellcrystallized W x V 1-x O 2 films with x ≈ 0.02 can have τ c ≈ 20 °C; 11 doping with atomic hydrogen is another possibility. 12 The magnitude of the resistance change at τ c depends on the degree of crystallinity, and epitaxial films can display a difference of three to four orders of magnitude.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is generally agreed that the structural changes and the Peierls mechanism alone cannot be fully responsible for the insulating nature of the M 1 phase. [12][13][14][15] Much previous effort has been focused on understanding the physics behind the MIT, especially the role electron-electron correlation and electron-lattice coupling play in driving the simultaneous structural and electronic phase transition. [14,[16][17][18][19][20] Whether the insulating M 1…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 This material is known to undergo a first order metal-to-insulator transition accompanied by a crystal structure transformation, and thin films of VO 2 reversibly switch between a low-temperature (monoclinic, M1) infrared-transmitting semiconducting state and a high-temperature (rutile) infrared-reflecting metallic state at a critical temperature s c of $68 C. The underlying mechanism is connected to a Mott-Hubbard transition and/or a Peierls mechanism and is of continued scientific interest; [2][3][4][5][6][7] it was recently described as a solid-state triple point. 2 The switching of the infrared transmittance enables a modulation of the solar energy throughput, which has led to large practical interest in thermochromic VO 2 as smart switchable coatings for energy-efficient windows.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%