Monocentric or Polycentric? The Urban Spatial Structure of Employment in Beijing

Abstract

Abstract:The spatial structure of Beijing has changed dramatically since the reforms of the late 1970s. It is not clear, however, whether these changes have been sufficient to transform the city's monocentric spatial structure into a polycentric one. This paper uses 2010 enterprise registered data to investigate the spatial distribution of employment in Beijing. Using a customized grid to increase the spatial resolution of our results, we explore the city's employment density distribution and investigate potential employment subcenters. This leads to several findings. First, Beijing still has strong monocentric characteristics; second, the city has a very large employment center rather than a small central business district; third, five subcenters are identified, including four in the suburbs; and fourth, a polycentric model that includes these subcenters possesses more explanatory power than a simple monocentric model, but by only four percentage. We conclude that the spatial structure of Beijing is still quite monocentric, but may be in transition to a polycentric pattern.

Decentralization and Polycentricity: Spatial Changes of Employment in Beijing Metropolitan Area, China

“…Since China's Reform and Opening up, Chinese cities have been experiencing an unprecedented rapid urbanization process [1,2], with the country's urbanization rate increasing from 17.9% in 1978 to 56.1% in 2016. That has led to a major human migration from the countryside to cities, especially to Beijing, Shanghai and other large cities [3].…”

Towards Equitable and Sustainable Urban Space: Introduction to Special Issue on “Urban Land and Sustainable Development”

“…Based on enterprise registered data in 2010, Huang et al investigate the employment density distribution as an indicator of urban spatial structure change in Beijing [44]. Their result shows that spatial structure of Beijing is still characterized by mono-centric development.…”

How Do Differences in Land Ownership Types in China Affect Land Development? A Case from Beijing

“…The establishment of an urban land market and the institutional design of the transfer of urban land use rights has succeeded in improving land use efficiency in urban areas, and has contributed to rapid urbanization in China, as well as ensuring massive infrastructure investment by governments [28][29][30]. However, the unequal land rights of collective ownership have prevented villagers from either engaging in more profitable land development or transferring their land use rights to others, which has weakened farmers' ability to develop their land.…”