2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2010.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monocanalicular versus bicanalicular silicone intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
43
1
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
6
43
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Lim et al, [18] reported canalicular laceration in six of the 122 patients who received bicanalicular tubing, while Andalib et al did not encounter punctum or canalicular complications in the series of 70 cases they studied. [19] In our study, no canalicular laceration was found in either group.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 40%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Lim et al, [18] reported canalicular laceration in six of the 122 patients who received bicanalicular tubing, while Andalib et al did not encounter punctum or canalicular complications in the series of 70 cases they studied. [19] In our study, no canalicular laceration was found in either group.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 40%
“…While Fayet and colleagues [31] noted an 85% success rate with monocanalicular intubation applied by different methods (e.g. pushing with a stent), Andalib et al, [32] in their study, compared conventional mononaural intubation with Fayet's method and reported success rates of 90% and 50%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[7][8][9][10][11] Orhan et al 9 used silicone intubation with the help of nasal endoscopic viewing in children with an age range of 18-48 months in the treatment of CNLDO. They found a 100% success rate for a follow-up period ranging from 4 to 24 months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been displayed that nasolacrimal duct intubation is a successful procedure in children aged up to 7 years. [7][8][9][10][11] On the other hand, the studies including children older than 7 years are very rare, and those studies had study population with wide age ranges also including younger children. 12,13 To the best of our knowledge, there is no study evaluating the success rates of nasolacrimal duct intubation for the treatment of CNLDO in only children older than 7 years of age.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%