2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2011.11.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mono-2-ethylhexylphthalate (MEHP) induces TNF-α release and macrophage differentiation through different signalling pathways in RAW264.7 cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These markers are associated with antigen processing and presentation and cytokine–cytokine receptor interaction in immune cells. Similar increases in inflammatory marker expression have been reported after DEHP and MEHP treatment in different monocyte/macrophage models, such as the macrophage RAW264.7 cell line, 37 human acute monocytic leukemia THP-1 cell line 38 and rat alveolar macrophages. 39 Moreover, MEHP increases IL-5 and IL-10 levels in cultures of local lymph node cells, suggesting that phthalates activate the adaptive immune system.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…These markers are associated with antigen processing and presentation and cytokine–cytokine receptor interaction in immune cells. Similar increases in inflammatory marker expression have been reported after DEHP and MEHP treatment in different monocyte/macrophage models, such as the macrophage RAW264.7 cell line, 37 human acute monocytic leukemia THP-1 cell line 38 and rat alveolar macrophages. 39 Moreover, MEHP increases IL-5 and IL-10 levels in cultures of local lymph node cells, suggesting that phthalates activate the adaptive immune system.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Although numerous caveats have been reported with the DCF assay, including effects of medium composition, serum, heme, heme proteins, metalloporphyrins and bovine serum albumin (Chen, et al, 2010), interactions with chemical toxicants have received nominal attention. Specifically relevant for the present study, reports of MEHP-stimulated and TBBPA-stimulated cellular generation of ROS using the DCF assay did not discuss cell-free assay controls (Bolling, et al, 2012; Fan, et al, 2010; Zhao, et al, 2012, Reistad, et al, 2005)). In contrast, recent reports discuss the impact of various experimental conditions on the accuracy of the DCF assay for assessment of x-radiation-stimulated and UVA-stimulated ROS generation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because culture media with or without serum and physiologic salt solutions have been used in reports of the DCF assay (Bolling, et al, 2012; Fan, et al, 2010; Zhao, et al, 2012) we evaluated interactions between MEHP and DCF in RPMI medium and HBSS buffer. Furthermore, we evaluated the effects of serum on MEHP-stimulated DCF fluorescence in RPMI medium but not in HBSS because serum is a common supplement of medium but not salt solutions like HBSS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As illustrated in Figure 1B, immunofluorescence revealed a barely detectable immunostaining of CD68 in CAFs (Figure 1B, d) and NHDFs (Figure 1B, g) meanwhile no expression can be detected for CD163 and F4/80 markers in CAFs (Figures 1B, e and f) and in NHDFs (Figures 1B, h and i), ruling out that the cells prepared from breast cancer tissue are not macrophages. The RAW264.7 cells, a partially differentiated macrophage-like monocytic cell line [31], was used as positive control, which expresses strongly CD68 (Figure 1B, a) and F4/80 (Figure 1B, c) markers with a moderate expression of CD163 marker (Figure 1B, b). In agreement with the present data, previous studies reported that fibroblasts isolated from normal skin, normal breast, and breast tumor tissue clearly expressed CD68 protein at levels comparable to macrophages [32, 33].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%