2020
DOI: 10.1186/s41747-020-00160-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring treatment effects in lung cancer-bearing mice: clinical CT and clinical MRI compared to micro-CT

Abstract: Background Compared to histology-based methods, imaging can reduce animal usage in preclinical studies. However, availability of dedicated scanners is limited. We evaluated clinical computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in comparison to dedicated CT (micro-CT) for assessing therapy effects in lung cancer-bearing mice. Methods Animals received cisplatin (n = 10), sham (n = 12), or no treatment (n = 9). All were examined via micro-CT, CT, and MRI before and after treatment. Semiautomated… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These methods have both advantages and limitations. For example, the radiation dose of CXR and CT is low, but MRI and PET have certain limitations in detecting and diagnosing lung nodules [ 21 , 22 ]. As an important feature of early lung cancer, rapid and effective diagnosis of lung nodules can effectively improve the survival rate of patients with lung diseases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods have both advantages and limitations. For example, the radiation dose of CXR and CT is low, but MRI and PET have certain limitations in detecting and diagnosing lung nodules [ 21 , 22 ]. As an important feature of early lung cancer, rapid and effective diagnosis of lung nodules can effectively improve the survival rate of patients with lung diseases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resolution at the cellular level is likely to increase soon, as the existing theoretical limits of X-ray imaging are greater than those of optical imaging and as micro-CT imaging technology is advancing day by day. In their study, Spiro et al compared micro-CT with clinical CT and clinical MRI regarding the monitoring of treatment effects in mice with lung cancer and found that micro-CT could be an appropriate method for evaluating the response to treatment in mice with cancer [42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, fused PET/CT images, metastases in the lung and thorax, even in the abdomen and liver, could be detected more precisely and accurately by PET/CT [ 32 ]. Although chest computed tomography (CT) is the most effective imaging tool for diagnosing primary lung cancer in clinical practice and preclinical studies [ 33 ], technical constraints still exist in detecting small metastases. These exemplified the complementary roles of PET and metabolomics approaches in this platform.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%