2018 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/i2mtc.2018.8409851
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring the magnetic axis misalignment in axially-symmetric magnets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the calculation of the magnetic field B we are using a state-of-the-art model by Derby & Olbert [44] that has been incorporated into a MATLAB tool by D. Cébron [45]. The success of this model has been demonstrated by various scientists and has been applied to many topics in solenoid research [46][47][48][49][50][51][52].…”
Section: Field Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the calculation of the magnetic field B we are using a state-of-the-art model by Derby & Olbert [44] that has been incorporated into a MATLAB tool by D. Cébron [45]. The success of this model has been demonstrated by various scientists and has been applied to many topics in solenoid research [46][47][48][49][50][51][52].…”
Section: Field Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, this paper tests three models for electron beam deflection -a direct-interaction model, a field based model, and predictions obtained with a commercially available software package. We present a direct-interaction model that considers the forces acting between the charge carriers of the electron beam and a coil to predict the deflection experienced by the beam due to the magnetic field, within the low velocity limit v ≪ c. The standard field model [25] is based on the derivations of Derby & Olbert [26] and Callaghan & Maslen [27], which has been further applied to solenoids with permeable cores, off-axis solenoids, parallel solenoids and axis alignment measurements [28][29][30][31][32][33]. These two models will be further compared to commercially available software CPO [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%