Monitoring the infection rate: Explaining the meaning of metrics in pandemic news experiences

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has brought forward questions of what citizens need and want from journalism in a global crisis. In this article, we analyse one particular aspect of pandemic news experiences: Preoccupation with monitoring metrics for COVID-19 infection cases, hospitalisations, and deaths, widely disseminated through journalistic news outlets. We ask why close monitoring of such metrics appeared meaningful to news users, and what these experiences can tell us about the role of journalism in the pandemic information environment. Our analysis draws on qualitative research conducted in Norway in 2020, finding users particularly devoted to monitoring metrics, both in early lockdown and during the second wave of COVID-19. To contextualize our findings, we draw on scholarship on emotional responses to data in the everyday, and on the social role of journalism. We argue that monitoring of infection rates is an expression of trust in the media as a provider of factual information, also expressed by those who are cynical towards other aspects of journalism, and we conceptualise this monitoring practice as a coping strategy to deal with the pandemic as an unknown and uncontrollable threat, involving difficult emotions of uncertainty and fear.

Ritual check-in, shocked immersion, regained stability: A sequential typology of news experiences in crisis situations

“…We conducted qualitative studies of news use during early lockdowns in spring 2020, and again towards the end of the year as infection rates were again rising and new restrictions loomed. We have analysed these developments in several publications (Dahl and Ytre-Arne, 2023; Ytre-Arne 2023; Ytre-Arne and Moe, 2021, 2023), finding similar phases of distant worries, world-shattering shock, fatigue and a new normal.…”