2020
DOI: 10.1016/s2213-2600(20)30162-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring the COVID-19 epidemic in the context of widespread local transmission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
84
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
84
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Another issue with comparing COVID-19 deaths across countries is the absence of a uniform way in classifying, recording and reporting COVID-19 deaths (7). There is a variation across countries in counting mortality "from" and mortality "with" COVID-19.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another issue with comparing COVID-19 deaths across countries is the absence of a uniform way in classifying, recording and reporting COVID-19 deaths (7). There is a variation across countries in counting mortality "from" and mortality "with" COVID-19.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The progress of a pandemic is essentially hard to forecast due to lack of knowledge about the infectious agent and population response behaviours [17,18]. This implies that the planning of response measures must be dynamically adapted to surveillance reports on the disease and immunity status in the population that the measures are intended for [19,20]. SARS-Cov-2 is transmitted through droplets from coughs and sneezing and contact with infectious secretions [9].…”
Section: Public Health Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst previous ecological studies of other epidemics have utilised case or death counts as outcome, 21 these variables may be prone to bias due to variations in country level control measures including different testing strategies, 22 variations in population movement controls and differences in secondary attack rates within community cohorts 23 . The mean mortality rate was thus chosen as outcome instead, since it is independent of these highly variable parameters and may thus represent a more reliable indicator of the country-level severity of the COVID-19 pandemic Mean mortality rate was defined as the slope of the mean mortality curve (Figure 1), measured from the first day when more than 2 COVID-19 deaths were reported until either the mortality curve reached a peak value or the 1 st of May 2020, whichever occurred first.…”
Section: Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%