2008
DOI: 10.1002/stc.213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring the collision of a cargo ship with the Vincent Thomas Bridge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mode 1 was not realized in NExT-ERA since the acceleration data contained weak vibration components in the lateral direction of the bridge under the ambient excitation without traffic loads. The modal parameters identified in this study agreed with those in previous studies [3,24,25]. Fig.…”
Section: Analysis Results Of the Experimental Datasupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Mode 1 was not realized in NExT-ERA since the acceleration data contained weak vibration components in the lateral direction of the bridge under the ambient excitation without traffic loads. The modal parameters identified in this study agreed with those in previous studies [3,24,25]. Fig.…”
Section: Analysis Results Of the Experimental Datasupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The investigation continued for about 2 h having no traffic on the bridge, and then the vehicular traffic was reopened. A detailed description of the ship-bridge collision accident can be found in Yun et al [3].…”
Section: Measurements Of Bridge Responses In Ship-bridge Collision Acmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SHM can serve as an effective tool to confirm the ship collision incident and evaluate the bridge condition after the collision incident. Yun et al used acceleration records to assess structural condition of the Vincent Thomas Bridge after ship collision …”
Section: Case 1: Ship Collision Incident On a Suspension Bridgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamic monitoring is relatively common in seismic zones with strong motion programs, although their potential for post-earthquake trauma seems to be underdeveloped, with very little is reported on the use of such instrumentation for post-trauma assessment. Two examples are use of a strong motion monitoring system to check effects of ship impact on Vincent Thomas Bridge (Yun at al., 2008) and an attempt to use ambient vibration survey to assess possible earthquake damage on a 7-storey Los Angeles building (Ivanovic et al, 2000). While it is hard to find published accounts of successful damage evaluation, two research exercises based on major construction events show the potential:…”
Section: Resilience In Bridges Structural Identification and Decisiomentioning
confidence: 99%